2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00493-017-3564-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Proof of Optimal Epsilon Nets

Abstract: Showing the existence of small-sized-nets has been the subject of investigation for almost 30 years, starting from the breakthrough of Haussler and Welzl (1987). Following a long line of successive improvements, recent results have settled the question of the size of the smallest-nets for set systems as a function of their so-called shallow cell complexity. In this paper we give a short proof of this theorem in the space of a few elementary paragraphs. This immediately implies all known cases of results on unw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first part of the following Theorem is an improvement of a recent theorem from [30] (see also the related discussions there), and the technique of the proof is similar. We should note, however, that the technique of the proof is also closely related to the peeling technique which originates from the empirical processes theory and which is widely used in the Learning Theory [7,8,35,36].…”
Section: A New Bound For ǫ-Netsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first part of the following Theorem is an improvement of a recent theorem from [30] (see also the related discussions there), and the technique of the proof is similar. We should note, however, that the technique of the proof is also closely related to the peeling technique which originates from the empirical processes theory and which is widely used in the Learning Theory [7,8,35,36].…”
Section: A New Bound For ǫ-Netsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The upper bound in Theorem 4 (i) is sharp for constant d, since it is a strengthening of an upper bound from [30] (see Section 5), which was recently shown to be tight in some specific cases in [22]. The upper bound in Theorem 4 (ii) may be stated in terms of τ i , but the formulation gets rather complicated, so we decided to omit it.…”
Section: A New Bound For ǫ-Netsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Given a set P of points in R d , and a parameter ε > 0, a set Q ⊆ P is an ε-net for P with respect to half-spaces if any half-space containing at least ε • |P| points of P contains at least one point of Q. It is well known that there always exists such an ε-net of size independent of |P| (see also [13]). Given an integer k 1, a set P ⊆ P is called a k-set of P if |P | = k and if there exists a halfspace h in R d such that P = P ∩ h. A set P ⊆ P is called a ( k)-set if P is an l-set for some l k. The next well-known theorem gives an upper bound on the number of ( k)-sets in a point set (see also [18]).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaufmann [8], introduced and provided the theory of fuzzy hypergraphs as a generalisation of concept of hypergraphs, in such a way that fuzzy hypergraphs have important applications to decision making, mobile network and similar applications [9,10]. Further materials regarding graphs and hypergraphs are available in the literature too [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%