1978
DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(78)90131-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple recording grip strength device

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each mouse was allowed to grab a bar attached to a force transducer (Model DFX II; Chatillon) as it was pulled by the tail horizontally away from the bar (Cabe et al, 1978). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each mouse was allowed to grab a bar attached to a force transducer (Model DFX II; Chatillon) as it was pulled by the tail horizontally away from the bar (Cabe et al, 1978). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on their average diet, the HMB dosage was calculated as ~1% CaHMB (Metabolic Technologies Inc., Ames, Iowa, USA), to achieve an ~0.50 g HMB/kg BW/daily dose [20]. Based on previous human studies, and assuming a rodents metabolism are at least 6 times more than humans, we chose a 6 gram metabolic equivalent HMB intervention (the upper limit given to humans in research [23]) and calculated a human-to-rodent conversion to provide an appropriate, and safe dosage for each animal [20]. Daily food consumption of rats was measured every 6th day by weighing the food remaining and subtracting it from the amount that was administered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it was removed from the apparatus and immediately evaluated for three parameters: (a) grip or prehension strength: resistance presented by the mice after they are placed on a grid and pulled by the tail (recording the highest figure of three measurements). The reading was carried out by a grip strength meter coupled to the grid (Cabe et al, 1978). (b) motor coordination: longer stay on the rotarod in two attempts of up to 60 s (Marques et al, 2004); (c) locomotor activity: evaluated in photocell motor activity boxes, for 30 min, according to the method described by Mendes et al (2002).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%