1994
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.9.2175-2181.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple, specific, and highly sensitive blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies to bovine herpesvirus 1

Abstract: By using a monoclonal antibody directed against an epitope located on glycoprotein B of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV1), a simple, convenient blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) which combines a high sensitivity with a low false-positive rate has been developed. The test can be performed at low variance on undiluted bovine serum samples. The epitope on glycoprotein B appears to be conserved, because it could be detected by immunostaining in all of 160 BHV1 isolates originating from 10 countries. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the gE-blocking ELISA is an important diagnostic test, because it is the companion test of the new generation of vaccines deleted in the BHV-1 gE gene, which are used in BHV-1 eradication programs (5,38). The results presented here indicate that in addition to animals that test false seronegative due to a lack of sensitivity of the serological test used (11,35), truly seronegative animals without any antibodies do also exist. The epidemiological consequences of both types of SNLC are identical because such animals are not detected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the gE-blocking ELISA is an important diagnostic test, because it is the companion test of the new generation of vaccines deleted in the BHV-1 gE gene, which are used in BHV-1 eradication programs (5,38). The results presented here indicate that in addition to animals that test false seronegative due to a lack of sensitivity of the serological test used (11,35), truly seronegative animals without any antibodies do also exist. The epidemiological consequences of both types of SNLC are identical because such animals are not detected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At the start of the study, blood samples from all cattle on the island were collected and screened for antibodies against BHV1, using a gB-blocking ELISA [18] in which sera were examined undiluted. As maternal antibodies can be detected up to 9 months of age [19] and because the gB-ELISA we used is very sensitive [18], seropositive cattle younger than 10 months of age were considered to be seropositive due to maternal antibodies and most likely not to be latently infected with BHV1. All seropositive cattle older than 10 months of age were considered to be latently infected with BHV1.…”
Section: Bhv1 Control Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the study, all cattle of groups 1 and 2 were screened for antibodies against BHV1, using a gBblocking ELISA [18] in which sera are examined undiluted, in November and March, the beginning and end of the housing period. The gD subunit vaccine does not induce antibodies against BHV1-gB.…”
Section: Monitoring Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms that the indirect ELISA used in this study is highly sensitive (12). Indeed, serological tests should be as sensitive as possible to detect low anti-BHV-1 antibody levels to minimize the risk of nondetection of BHV-1 latent carriers (22). However, improving the test sensitivity will affect the specificity by increasing the number of false-positive animals (44).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%