2020
DOI: 10.1142/s0217732320501710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple superconductor quantum interference device for testing gravity

Abstract: A simple tabletop setup based on a superconductor quantum interference device is proposed to test the gravitational interaction. A D-shaped superconducting loop has the straight segment immersed inside a massive sphere while the half-circle segment is wrapped around the sphere. The superconducting condensate within the straight arm of the loop thus bathes inside a gravitational simple harmonic oscillator potential while the condensate in the half-circle arm bathes in the constant gravitational potential around… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for some positive integer n, in which case the confluent hypergeometric function in expression (10) becomes a finite-degree polynomial. The condition (11), in turn, implies that,…”
Section: In Minkowski Spacetime: M =mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for some positive integer n, in which case the confluent hypergeometric function in expression (10) becomes a finite-degree polynomial. The condition (11), in turn, implies that,…”
Section: In Minkowski Spacetime: M =mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [11] the effect of gravity on a macroscopic quantum state-the superfluid made of superconducting electrons-has been investigated through the Josephson effect. In both works, the key idea is based on quantum interference induced by gravity (see also Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of illustration and simplicity, we display here explicitly the expression we obtain when keeping only the first term of the sum in Equation (23). By substituting the constants ε, κ and τ, as well as the term N 0 = 1 (as given in Appendix A) into Equation ( 23), we find…”
Section: The Quantized Energy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Landau levels are completely destroyed, we see that even at this order in the approximation the magnetization is completely different from the expression (35). Actually, even Formulas (31) and (32) do not hold anymore, for such formulas were derived by assuming the linear dependence (32) of mi2 n,s on the integer n. As expression (24) of E n, ,s in terms of n displays no such linearity, and since that expression (24) is itself only an approximation for the highly nonlinear full expression (23), we conclude that the Landau-levels-based formalism for computing the magnetization M of neutron stars does not generally apply to the charged plasma in the core of highly dense neutron stars. The condition for the applicability of the formalism is to have the quartic anharmonic oscillator potential term in Equation ( 22) negligible, i.e., to have λ |e|B/h or to apply the formalism only to fermions close to the vicinity of the star's center.…”
Section: Inside a Neutron Starmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation