2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple system for phenotyping of plant transpiration and stomatal conductance response to drought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-destructive methods, such as infrared gas exchange analyzers (Garen et al ., 2022) and infrared imaging (Jones et al ., 2002), infer stomatal activities through infrared gas sensors or leaf surface temperature. Infrared gas exchange analyzers are often considered the ‘gold standard’ for determining gaseous fluxes (Driever et al ., 2023). Destructive techniques, such as stomatal imprints (Scarpeci et al ., 2017), chemical dye staining (Eisele et al ., 2016), and scanning electron microscopy (Tsai et al ., 2022), provide direct visualization of stomatal traits such as stomatal density, stomatal shape, stomatal pore size, and stomatal distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-destructive methods, such as infrared gas exchange analyzers (Garen et al ., 2022) and infrared imaging (Jones et al ., 2002), infer stomatal activities through infrared gas sensors or leaf surface temperature. Infrared gas exchange analyzers are often considered the ‘gold standard’ for determining gaseous fluxes (Driever et al ., 2023). Destructive techniques, such as stomatal imprints (Scarpeci et al ., 2017), chemical dye staining (Eisele et al ., 2016), and scanning electron microscopy (Tsai et al ., 2022), provide direct visualization of stomatal traits such as stomatal density, stomatal shape, stomatal pore size, and stomatal distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%