2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10463-008-0169-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple test for the parametric form of the variance function in nonparametric regression

Abstract: In this paper a new test for the parametric form of the variance function in the common nonparametric regression model is proposed which is applicable under very weak assumptions. The new test is based on an empirical process formed from pseudo residuals, for which weak convergence to a Gaussian process can be established. In the special case of testing for homoscedasticity the limiting process is essentially a Brownian bridge, such that critical values are easily available. The new procedure has three main ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further the empirical distribution function of estimated errors recently turned out to be valuable for goodness-of-fit tests concerning the regression or variance function, see Van Keilegom, González Manteiga and Sánchez Sellero (2004) and Dette and Van Keilegom (2005), or for testing the equality of regression functions in a two-sample problem, see PardoFernández, Van Keilegom and González-Manteiga (2004) and Neumeyer and Dette (2005). We denote by F n the (not available) empirical distribution function of unobserved errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further the empirical distribution function of estimated errors recently turned out to be valuable for goodness-of-fit tests concerning the regression or variance function, see Van Keilegom, González Manteiga and Sánchez Sellero (2004) and Dette and Van Keilegom (2005), or for testing the equality of regression functions in a two-sample problem, see PardoFernández, Van Keilegom and González-Manteiga (2004) and Neumeyer and Dette (2005). We denote by F n the (not available) empirical distribution function of unobserved errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the processesŜ * t andŜ * * t exhibit the same asymptotic behaviour as the corresponding process considered by Dette and Hetzler (2006) …”
Section: The Partial Linear Regression Model With Fixed Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…. , Z n ) The weak convergence of the stochastic process defined on the right hand side of (5.7) has been established by Dette and Hetzler (2006) ) by Markov's inequality. For the remaining part of the proof we establish the estimatê…”
Section: Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the choice of the difference sequence is still rather arbitrary in the recent literature. For instance, Hall and Heckman (2000) and Shen and Brown (2006) used the Rice estimator; Munk et al (2005), Einmahl and Van Keilegom (2008), and Dette and Hetzler (2009) used the ordinary estimators; Brown and Levine (2007), Benko, Härdle andKneip (2009), andPendakur andSperlich (2010) used the optimal estimators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%