2001
DOI: 10.1177/104063870101300518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simple Thin-Layer Chromatographic Method for the Detection of Ergovaline in Leaf Sheaths of Tall Fescue (Festuca Arundinacea) Infected with Neotyphodium Coenophialum

Abstract: Abstract.A relatively simple and inexpensive thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) method is described for the detection and semiquantitative measurement of ergovaline in leaf sheaths of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Samples were finely ground and extracted with methanol. The extracts were filtered and the methanol was evaporated. The aqueous residue was extracted with hexane, followed by chloroform at pH 9. The chloroform extract was concentrated and further purified on a preparative silica gel TLC plate, dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore important to consider both epimers when the ergot alkaloid contamination level of a cereal or cereal product has to be determined. Different methods have been reported for the analysis of ergot alkaloids, including thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Salvat & Godoy, 2001), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Franch & Blaschke, 1998), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Hill et al, 2001), gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD) (Barrow & Quigley, 1975), liquid chromatography (LC) with ultraviolet (Veress, 1993), fluorescence (Komarova & Tolkachev, 2001;Storm et al, 2008) or mass spectrometric (MS) (Burk et al, 2006;Kokkonen & Jestoi, 2010;Krska, Stubbings, Macarthur, & Crews, 2008;Mohamed, Gremaud, Rychoz-Payot, Tabet, & Guy, 2006) detection. In recent years, LC-MS has become the method of choice for mycotoxin determination (Shephard et al, 2011;Spanjer, 2010), and has provided an unequivocal identification of ergot alkaloids in various matrices (Friedrich et al, 2004;Lehner, Craig, Fannin, Bush, & Tobin, 2005;Mohamed et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore important to consider both epimers when the ergot alkaloid contamination level of a cereal or cereal product has to be determined. Different methods have been reported for the analysis of ergot alkaloids, including thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Salvat & Godoy, 2001), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Franch & Blaschke, 1998), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Hill et al, 2001), gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD) (Barrow & Quigley, 1975), liquid chromatography (LC) with ultraviolet (Veress, 1993), fluorescence (Komarova & Tolkachev, 2001;Storm et al, 2008) or mass spectrometric (MS) (Burk et al, 2006;Kokkonen & Jestoi, 2010;Krska, Stubbings, Macarthur, & Crews, 2008;Mohamed, Gremaud, Rychoz-Payot, Tabet, & Guy, 2006) detection. In recent years, LC-MS has become the method of choice for mycotoxin determination (Shephard et al, 2011;Spanjer, 2010), and has provided an unequivocal identification of ergot alkaloids in various matrices (Friedrich et al, 2004;Lehner, Craig, Fannin, Bush, & Tobin, 2005;Mohamed et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical techniques have been used to monitor the presence of such contamination in food products. Thin‐layer chromatography (TLC),14, 15 high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet16, 17 or fluorimetric18, 19 detection, a gas liquid chromatography system (GLC) with electron capture detection,20, 21 and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS)22, 23 have been reported for the determination of ergot alkaloids and lysergic acid derivatives. Several matrices were studied such as cereals and cereal products22, 24, 25 and human and animal biological fluids 15, 16, 21, 23, 26.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of the exposure and actual risk due to consumption of contaminated food and feedstuffs requires suitable analytical strategies. Analytical methods for the determination of ergot alkaloids include thin layer chromatography (TLC) (Salvat and Godoy, 2001), capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Franch and Blaschke, 1998), enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Hill et al, 2001), gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (ECD) (Barrow and Quigley, 1975), liquid chromatography (LC) with ultraviolet (Veress, 1993), fluorescence (Komarova and Tolkachev, 2001a;Storm et al, 2008) or mass spectrometric (MS) (Diana di Mavungu et al, 2012;Burk et al, 2006;Kokkonen and Jestoi, 2010;Krska et al, 2008a;Mohamed et al, 2006b) detection. Over the last decade, LC-MS has become a dominant tool for mycotoxin determination, and has provided an unequivocal identification of ergot alkaloids in various matrices (Diana di Mavungu et al, 2012;Friedrich et al, 2004;Kokkonen and Jestoi, 2009;Krska et al, 2008;Lehner et al, 2005;Mohamed et al, 2006a;Mohamed et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%