2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.06.142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified approach for modelling latent heat storages: Application and validation on two different fin-and-tubes heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these expressions were retrieved considering a specific LHTS design with fixed operating parameters (such as water mass flow rate and temperatures), the proposed methodology can be easily tailored to different LHTS concepts and operating conditions. Indeed, the evolution of the LHTS heat rate highlighted by several studies [12,15,22] is comparable with the one expressed by Equations ( 8) and ( 9).…”
Section: Compact Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although these expressions were retrieved considering a specific LHTS design with fixed operating parameters (such as water mass flow rate and temperatures), the proposed methodology can be easily tailored to different LHTS concepts and operating conditions. Indeed, the evolution of the LHTS heat rate highlighted by several studies [12,15,22] is comparable with the one expressed by Equations ( 8) and ( 9).…”
Section: Compact Modelsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In an attempt to simplify the simulation of LHTS systems, Neumann et al [12] coupled a 1D model for the heat exchanger tubes and a reduced 3D model for the PCM and fins. This model can be used to improve the geometric and operational parameters of fin-and-tubes LHTSs with a limited computational effort, although the PCM parameters should be carefully calibrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is worth mentioning that the considered parameter is not precisely a processing capacity indicator, as many relevant factors in the studies are different, such as geometries, numerical configurations, solution methods, and the number of iterations per time step. The implementation of the numerical methods for solving melting and solidification problems in latent heat storage, as well as details about the accuracy, grid independence and validation codes using commercial software, as well as self-developed codes can be found in works [135,136]. It is worth emphasizing that the in-lab-scale or full-scale heat exchangers have also been discussed in the literature (see Zauner et al, 2016 [137]).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Computers and Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model can be simplified during solidification, since during this process natural convection does not occur. In [19], a simplified COMSOL model is implemented, in which a 3D model of only the portion of PCM between the fins is combined with a 1D model of the heat exchanger. The results for paraffin showed a good agreement with the experimental results, during both charge and discharge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%