2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1018-3639(18)30779-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Computation of the Interactive Behavior between Soils and Framed Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To counteract the creep effect, we subjected the soil to continuous loads for 1, 100, 1000, 3000, 6000, and 12000 days in this case to counteract the creep effect. This period is usually considered adequate to complete primary consolidation and detect the beginning of creep (Al-Shamrani and Al-Mashary, 2003) . Especially when comparing creep rate models of the compressible soil layer, the applied vertical stress affects the observed vertical strain.…”
Section: Vertical Strain Over Time In Compressible Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To counteract the creep effect, we subjected the soil to continuous loads for 1, 100, 1000, 3000, 6000, and 12000 days in this case to counteract the creep effect. This period is usually considered adequate to complete primary consolidation and detect the beginning of creep (Al-Shamrani and Al-Mashary, 2003) . Especially when comparing creep rate models of the compressible soil layer, the applied vertical stress affects the observed vertical strain.…”
Section: Vertical Strain Over Time In Compressible Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequently the researchers have been focused on slip and bonding analysis in interface [16][17][18]. Debonding has been unexplored due to occurrence of numerical ill-conditioning [19][20]. Interfaces were also used as a geometric attachment to various dissimilar materials where relative motion is not of great importance [21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 6, the lateral displacements of none of the frames of type 111 exceed the limit (labelled S.O. limit), which requires the second order analysis [6]. Therefore the frames of type 111 can be defined as non-sway.…”
Section: Figure 4: Effect Of Support Conditions On Frame Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of existing works deal with column base stiffness [3] , [4] and [5], only very limited information is available on possible soil-structure interaction effects on the distribution of forces and the stability of the frame. It is clearly shown in [6] and [7] that soil-structure interaction effects cannot be neglected. Single-storey buildings typically incorporate steel sheeting as a roof deck, which can be applied as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to vertically braced bents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%