GeoFlorida 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1061/41095(365)314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Coupled Soil-Pore Water Pressure Generation for Use in Site Response Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease of the CSR value results from the degradation of the shear modulus of the soil that can be related to the pore water pressure ratio R u , Eq. 9, (Matasovic and Vucetic 1993;Chang et al 2007;Moreno-Torres et al 2010):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of the CSR value results from the degradation of the shear modulus of the soil that can be related to the pore water pressure ratio R u , Eq. 9, (Matasovic and Vucetic 1993;Chang et al 2007;Moreno-Torres et al 2010):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing the degradation indexes, the relationship proposed by Moreno-Torres et al [19] is obtained:…”
Section: Cyclic Stress-strain Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the proportionality between the number of cycles, N, and the damage parameter,  (eq. 19), any pore pressure change can be expressed as a variation of the normalized damage parameter, / L (see [26] for details).…”
Section: Generation Of Excess Pore Water Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified hyperbolic model MRDF+D (modulus reduction and damping curve fit using a reduction factor) which simultaneously match modulus reduction and damping soil curves for nonlinear site response analysis was introduced by Phillips and Hashash (2009) and it was modified to incorporate the degradation indices defined above. Then, Moreno et al (2010) proposed the following equations to compute shear stress values (t) during loading and unloading -reloading, respectively, corresponding to a given strain.…”
Section: Simplified Quasi-coupled Hyperbolic Stress-strain Cons-titutmentioning
confidence: 99%