1978
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1978.308680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Instrument Failure Detection Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hint: see [226,227]. 23 [53,88,139,151,154,155,178,238,249,311,312,331,332]. Write a summary report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hint: see [226,227]. 23 [53,88,139,151,154,155,178,238,249,311,312,331,332]. Write a summary report.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Simplified detection scheme (Clark, 1978): this scheme is a particular case of the DOS, and makes use of only one observer driven by only one measurement. Therefore, if any other measurement is faulty, the corresponding residual is non-zero.…”
Section: Ariola Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For estimating virtual sensor outputs and for generating the residuals, several techniques have been proposed in related disciplines. Widely used and 7/43 well accepted approaches include, e.g., estimation filters [31,32], band-limiting filters [33] as well as innovation testing based on Kalman filters [34], threshold logic [35], and generalized likelihood ratio testing [36]. Among the most efficient approaches for estimating virtual sensor outputs is the application of artificial neural networks, because neural networks are capable to accurately model non-linear and dynamic decentralized systems (such as wireless SHM systems) without the need for first-principle models or a priori knowledge about the complex internal structures of the system observed [37].…”
Section: /43mentioning
confidence: 99%