SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2008
DOI: 10.2118/115378-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simplified Method for Prediction of ECD Increase with Drillpipe Rotation

Abstract: The ability to accurately predict the effect of drillpipe rotation on Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) remains a challenge for those involved in engineering today's complex wells. In many of these challenging wells (extended-reach drilling, deepwater, HPHT, etc.), the safe drilling window between hole collapse and fracturing is often narrow. Accurate prediction of the effect of drillpipe rotational speed could allow better optimization of operational parameters in the drilling process, and hopefully reduce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the results from the majority of the laboratory studies, most of the field measurements (Delwiche et al 1992;Ward and Andreassen 1998;Isambourg et al 1998;Charlez et al 1998;Green et al 1999;Hemphill et al 2007;Hemphill et al 2008) have shown a significant increase in pressure loss as the pipe rotation increases. The discrepancy between lab observations and field measurements can be attributed to several factors, such as drillpipe wobbling or instability, the irregular geometry of the wellbore, tool joint effect, or a combination of these factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike the results from the majority of the laboratory studies, most of the field measurements (Delwiche et al 1992;Ward and Andreassen 1998;Isambourg et al 1998;Charlez et al 1998;Green et al 1999;Hemphill et al 2007;Hemphill et al 2008) have shown a significant increase in pressure loss as the pipe rotation increases. The discrepancy between lab observations and field measurements can be attributed to several factors, such as drillpipe wobbling or instability, the irregular geometry of the wellbore, tool joint effect, or a combination of these factors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The measured and predicted pressure loss ratios vary from 1.05 to 1.23 indicating significant increase in annular pressure loss with the increases in the rotation speed. Furthermore, the accuracy of the new model is compared with the existing model developed by Hemphill et al (2008). When tested with the data from Well C, the new model shows better accuracy than the existing one (Fig.…”
Section: Measured (Kpa/m) Predicted (Kpa/m)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the results from the majority of the laboratory studies, most of the field measurements [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have shown a significant increase in pressure loss as the pipe rota tion increases. The discrepancy between lab observations and field measurements can be attributed to several factors, such as operat ing with multiple dimension scales, drillpipe wobbling or instabil ity, the irregular geometry of the wellbore, tool joint effect, far too simple fluid systems in the laboratory or a combination of these factors.…”
Section: Field Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although, a study of flow behavior when pipe is rotating is still complex especially in drilling operation, there are several literatures proposed empirical correlations and mechanistic models. Hemphill et al [4] developed the general equation for increased pressure loss with rotation in term of diameter ratio and rotation speed (rpm) as expressed in (8)…”
Section: B Effect Of Pipe Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deviation of predicted data are compared with measured data in every recorded depth. The less statistical value of deviation gives more accurate result, so it is obvious that the combination of Blasius formula and increased-pressure-loss equation proposed by Hemphill et al (2008) (Model B1) can accurately estimate downhole pressure in practical field in both stationary situation and rotating drillpipe. On the other hand, decreasing annular gap width will increase pressure loss.…”
Section: B Downhole Pressure With Pipe Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%