2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified model of the interaction of the trawl warps, the otterboards and netting drag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interaction effects were evaluated between variables for each regression, either in physical modeling or in dynamic simulation, and effects found were not considered significant (p < 0.05). In specific terms, the total drag (TD) and net drag (ND) can be explained by the speed (S) and the wing-end spread (WS), as reported by Fiorentini et al (2004) and Prat et al (2008) who relates net drag with the squared speed:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interaction effects were evaluated between variables for each regression, either in physical modeling or in dynamic simulation, and effects found were not considered significant (p < 0.05). In specific terms, the total drag (TD) and net drag (ND) can be explained by the speed (S) and the wing-end spread (WS), as reported by Fiorentini et al (2004) and Prat et al (2008) who relates net drag with the squared speed:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can clearly examine the effects of alterations to the design and rigging, effect of towing speed on geometry and orientation, and measuring forces acting on the gear and to measure motions of fishing gear. Although, computational modeling is a valuable complementary tool to assess behavior of bottom trawl fishing gears (Prat et al, 2008), and it can estimate net shape configurations and loads (Niedzwiedz and Hopp, 1998), design defects are clearly visible in flume tank and do not require more questioning, while viewing the results of the simulation is much more complex. This was demonstrated in the evaluation stages of the model in the flume tank, where it was possible to observe deficiencies in the estimation of riblines lengths that were corrected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gear performance (i.e., door spread, horizontal and vertical net openings) was measured on all hauls using the SCANBAS SGM-15 system (SCANMAR, Norway). A laptop, with customized software, automatically controlled data acquisition and provided real-time information about the correct functioning of the system (Prat et al 2008;Sala et al 2009). The main goal of these measurements was to obtain detailed real time data on gear performance for each haul, in order to determine possible influences of the TED on net behaviour and to calculate vessel speed and tow duration.…”
Section: Sea Trials and Gear Behaviour Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also exist studies that compare flume tank results with full-scale sea trial data for both isolated nets and full gear [50,13,18]. In addition, a number of numerical models to simulate net dynamics have been developed [3,23,27,49,34,44,20], and also some models of complete gears, including a crude [19] or somewhat fair [14,33] description of trawl door behaviour, have been devised. A careful literature search shows that the first and only full trawl gear simulation embodying thorough modelling of the otter boards was undertaken by [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%