2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation-based framework for estimating probable open-pit mine closure time and cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on mine closure and post-mining land use have primarily focused on remediation and rehabilitation of mined lands with limited consideration of stakeholder perspectives and the broader social, economic, and cultural impacts of closure [29,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Research on sustainable development and mine closure has focused on risks [69][70][71][72] and costs [73,74] associated with mine closure, as well as policies related to closure [75,76]. A couple studies have focused on community wellbeing in the context of mine closure.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on mine closure and post-mining land use have primarily focused on remediation and rehabilitation of mined lands with limited consideration of stakeholder perspectives and the broader social, economic, and cultural impacts of closure [29,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. Research on sustainable development and mine closure has focused on risks [69][70][71][72] and costs [73,74] associated with mine closure, as well as policies related to closure [75,76]. A couple studies have focused on community wellbeing in the context of mine closure.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) modified the OSMRE classification by aggregating similar detail cost items into some general items [3]. Some researchers [28][29][30][31] focus on developing simulation-based approaches to estimate mine closure and reclamation costs. In these studies, by defining different scenarios and using the Monte Carlo simulation method, a probabilistic distribution diagram of mine reclamation costs is presented, determining mine reclamation costs at varying levels of risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concern for miners is that poor closure estimates underestimate capital investment decisions and may even lead to incomplete reporting of financial obligation (liability).Successfully financing and cost estimating closure, decommissioning, and reclamation programmes requires a strategic and collaborative approach that examines the complexities of the mine site itself, the expectations of the surrounding communities, socio-economic considerations, and regulatory requirements. Successful mine closure and related costs can be improved by using three strategies, avoiding, reducing, and correcting negative impacts (Paricheh & Osanloo 2017).The paper will focus on improving global perspectives and best practices in mine decommissioning, closure, and reclamation financing and cost estimating.Our methodology will incorporate our experiences working on global mine closure programmes for major clients, which has enabled us to amass a significant database of cost and schedule information. Additionally, our methodology will incorporate our findings from a collaborative survey, research, and interviews where we explored what it takes to deliver successful outcomes in mine closure estimating.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successfully financing and cost estimating closure, decommissioning, and reclamation programmes requires a strategic and collaborative approach that examines the complexities of the mine site itself, the expectations of the surrounding communities, socio-economic considerations, and regulatory requirements. Successful mine closure and related costs can be improved by using three strategies, avoiding, reducing, and correcting negative impacts (Paricheh & Osanloo 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%