2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-006-9970-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure for BOT network design problem

Abstract: Solving optimization problems with multiple objectives under uncertainty is generally a very difficult task. Evolutionary algorithms, particularly genetic algorithms, have shown to be effective in solving this type of complex problems. In this paper, we develop a simulation-based multi-objective genetic algorithm (SMOGA) procedure to solve the build-operate-transfer (BOT) network design problem with multiple objectives under demand uncertainty. The SMOGA procedure integrates stochastic simulation, a traffic as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like scatter search, GA is a population-based metaheuristic which was first introduced by Holland (1975). GA has been successfully applied in the network design problems (e.g., Yin, 2000;Drezner and Salhi, 2002;Drezner and Wesolowsky, 2003;Cantarella et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Comparison With Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like scatter search, GA is a population-based metaheuristic which was first introduced by Holland (1975). GA has been successfully applied in the network design problems (e.g., Yin, 2000;Drezner and Salhi, 2002;Drezner and Wesolowsky, 2003;Cantarella et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2006).…”
Section: Comparison With Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their fitness values, f (1), f (2), f (3), and f (4), will be set to 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; thus chromosome 4 is the globally optimal solution. We will execute a GA with proportional selection and without crossover.…”
Section: Effects Of the Distribution Of Additive Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…mization tool for dealing with noisy objective functions (e.g., Beyer [2], Di Pietro, While, and Barone [5], Chen, Subprasom, and Ji [3]). In theoretical studies that examine evolutionary computation schemes applied to perturbed fitness functions, fitness functions are typically assumed to be disturbed by a single source of additive noise (e.g., Goldberg and Rudnick [6], Miller and Goldberg [13], Nissen and Propach [16], Beyer [2], Rudolph [21], Arnold [1], Di Pietro, While, and Barone [5]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies are mostly restricted to simple networks, having either parallel or serial links. The given problem has been also examined for the case of general inter-urban road networks in [12][13][14] under alternative project objectives and market condition. These models have considered a standard, deterministic user equilibrium (DUE) traffic assignment procedure with elastic demand to represent the responses of users to optimal flat (uniform) tolls and capacity investments.…”
Section: Issues In Joint Decisions Of Optimal Road Investment and Primentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strong assumption typically employed in the existing literature (e.g., see [11][12][13][14]) treats road capacity as being adjustable in continuous increments. Provided that, in reality, the number of lanes or links is discrete, the expression of capacity as a discrete variable provides a solution that is infrastructure related, which may involve greater physical intuition and bearing in the road network design for investment planning purposes, in comparison to the solution of the corresponding continuous version of the problem.…”
Section: Issues In Joint Decisions Of Optimal Road Investment and Primentioning
confidence: 99%