2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation-based suitability index of the quality and quantity of agricultural drainage water for reuse in irrigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that there was no need to reuse agricultural drainage water (ADW) for irrigation purposes in the study area during the winter season. The ADW reuse is widely practiced in the Nile delta by pumping ADW from the main drains into the main irrigation canals [61]. These results are consistent with Khater et al [37] who noticed that there is no need to reuse ADW to satisfy the irrigation water requirements in the Nile delta during the winter of 2008.…”
Section: Water Balance Along the Al-qased Canalsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results indicated that there was no need to reuse agricultural drainage water (ADW) for irrigation purposes in the study area during the winter season. The ADW reuse is widely practiced in the Nile delta by pumping ADW from the main drains into the main irrigation canals [61]. These results are consistent with Khater et al [37] who noticed that there is no need to reuse ADW to satisfy the irrigation water requirements in the Nile delta during the winter of 2008.…”
Section: Water Balance Along the Al-qased Canalsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The fluctuation in ADW quality due to pollution is considered to be the main issue in the appropriate reuse of ADW. The most common challenge involved in decisions regarding ADW reuse is how to determine whether the quality of the drainage water is suitable for reuse [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P i and C i are the predicted and analytically calculated values, respectively; C mean is the mean of the analytically calculated values; and N is the number of measurements. Model predictions are acceptable for NOF values in the interval from 0.0 to 1.0 (Allam et al, 2015).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%