AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit 2006
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simulation Benchmark for Integrated Fault Tolerant Flight Control Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The manoeuvre, here considered, is the same described in the previous subsection, but the failure scenario consists in the loss of the vertical tail (Smaili et al, 2006). The initial flight condition data are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Right Turn and Localizer Intercept With Loss Of Vertical Tailmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The manoeuvre, here considered, is the same described in the previous subsection, but the failure scenario consists in the loss of the vertical tail (Smaili et al, 2006). The initial flight condition data are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Right Turn and Localizer Intercept With Loss Of Vertical Tailmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The works has been performed within the GARTEUR Action Group 16, project focused on Fault-Tolerant Control. In that project a benchmark environment (Smaili et al, 2006) has been developed modelling a bunch of surface actuators faulty conditions. A brief summary of all these conditions is given in Table 3, while a detailed explanation of the benchmark can be found in (Smaili et al, 2006).…”
Section: Numerical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The potential of this routine is shown in the example in the next section. This RECOVER (REcon¦gurable COntrol for Vehicle Emergency Relief) benchmark model is discussed in detail by Smaili et al [26,27] and has been used in the earlier publications of this research project, but also in earlier versions by a number of investigators and organizations [28 30]. The simulation benchmark for evaluating fault tolerant §ight controllers as discussed by Smaili et al [26] contains six benchmark fault scenarios, enumerated in Table 1.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially a least-squares based identifier is of interest, since this type of identifier possesses excellent convergence properties and guaranteed parameter convergence to constant values. In [131,132,188] an adaptive NDI design with recursive least-squares identifier is used for the design of a reconfigurable flight control system for a fly-by-wire Boeing 747. However, theoretical stability and convergence results for the closed-loop system are not provided, since the least-squares identifier, like all traditional identifiers, is not fast enough to capture the potential faster-than-linear growth of nonlinear systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%