2015
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation method for high‐cycle fatigue‐driven delamination using a cohesive zone model

Abstract: A novel computational method for simulating fatigue-driven mixed-mode delamination cracks in laminated structures under cyclic loading is presented. The proposed fatigue method is based on linking a cohesive zone model for quasi-static crack growth and a Paris' law-like model described as a function of the energy release rate for the crack growth rate during cyclic loading. The J-integral has been applied to determine the energy release rate. Unlike other cohesive fatigue methods, the proposed method depends o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of using the single point (SP) estimation, the ERR can also be extracted by computing the J‐integral around the interface elements as done by Bak et al This is equal to integrating the traction‐separation behavior of the complete FPZ. The J‐integral over the FPZ can be defined as follows: GnormalJ=true0max(δ)τnormaldδ, which is computed by means of the Riemann sum.…”
Section: Materials Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead of using the single point (SP) estimation, the ERR can also be extracted by computing the J‐integral around the interface elements as done by Bak et al This is equal to integrating the traction‐separation behavior of the complete FPZ. The J‐integral over the FPZ can be defined as follows: GnormalJ=true0max(δ)τnormaldδ, which is computed by means of the Riemann sum.…”
Section: Materials Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harper and Hallett 20 showed that the ERR of a specimen is equal to the local ERR G sp of a single material point at the physical crack tip. Instead of using the single point (SP) estimation, the ERR can also be extracted by computing the J-integral around the interface elements as done by Bak et al 19 This is equal to integrating the traction-separation behavior of the complete FPZ. The J-integral over the FPZ can be defined as follows:…”
Section: Cohesive Zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been proposed based on the Finite Element Method framework and have been used to simulate interface crack propagation convincingly. Recent examples include the Virtual Crack Closing Technique (VCCT) [9], the Crack Surface Displacement Extrapolation method (CSDE) [10][11] as well as cohesive zone modelling (CZM) [12]. Moreover, the CSDE method has been applied in conjunction with the cycle jump technique (CJT) [13][14][15] to reduce the calculated loading cycles of fatigue simulations.…”
Section: Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], the authors incorporated a link between the damage rate, dD/dN , and the crack growth rate, da/dN , which was later followed in [29][30][31][33][34][35]. By using this approach, any influence of the load ratio, R, and/or the mode mixity, Φ, is included in the formulation by means of a phenomenological model for the crack growth rate, da/dN = f (G max , R, Φ...).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%