2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models

Abstract: Background: Many studies conducted in health and social sciences collect individual level data as outcome measures. Usually, such data have a hierarchical structure, with patients clustered within physicians, and physicians clustered within practices. Large survey data, including national surveys, have a hierarchical or clustered structure; respondents are naturally clustered in geographical units (e.g., health regions) and may be grouped into smaller units. Outcomes of interest in many fields not only reflect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
253
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
253
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, children in districts further from central Shanghai were more likely to be from low-income, rural migrant families. We reported findings from the clustered robust standard errors instead of those from the multilevel modeling because the small number of districts (N = 7) may produce bias and inaccurate estimates in multilevel logistic regression models [34]. We present these results using multiply imputed data in Table 3.…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, children in districts further from central Shanghai were more likely to be from low-income, rural migrant families. We reported findings from the clustered robust standard errors instead of those from the multilevel modeling because the small number of districts (N = 7) may produce bias and inaccurate estimates in multilevel logistic regression models [34]. We present these results using multiply imputed data in Table 3.…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However in our simulation this is not the case probably due to the large sample size. In addition, Moineddin et al [21] did not vary prevalence of the outcome and ICC simultaneously, whereas we varied these for 3 rd level and 2 nd level clusters simultaneously. Though we did not find any particular pattern in the bias with respect to varying prevalence of the outcome and ICCs, the bias of the variance component increased slightly when the ICC increased for both scaling methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this study did not involve a complex survey design with weights [21]. Large bias was observed for low prevalence (10%) of the outcome when the size of the cluster was small, that is 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, we ran a simulation program similar to Moineddin [13] with CS within subject correlation structure to confirm the results. For the purpose of comparing of simulation and our formula, we assume the sample size is 200 and without any drop outs.…”
Section: Examples Of Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variance consists of two components: the G-side random effects and the R-side errors. The variance is formulated as (13) This can be rewritten as (14) by putting the first term into the sandwich-like error structure of so that G becomes transformed G*. We can further simplify equation (14) by extracting a combined variance parameter so the transformed R* matrix contains only the correlation parameters ρ*.…”
Section: Sample Size and Power Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%