1989
DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(89)90103-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study of sequencing and maintenance decisions in a dynamic job shop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Largest Buffer to Previous 1,2,or 3 Photo Step(s) (BACK1, BACK2, BACK3): This policy attempts to give priority to a down machine that has a large amount of WIP upstream from it that will be delayed if the machine is down for any length of time. It looks at the amount of WIP between the process step(s) on which the down machine works and the previous photo step(s).…”
Section: A Maintenance Staffing Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Largest Buffer to Previous 1,2,or 3 Photo Step(s) (BACK1, BACK2, BACK3): This policy attempts to give priority to a down machine that has a large amount of WIP upstream from it that will be delayed if the machine is down for any length of time. It looks at the amount of WIP between the process step(s) on which the down machine works and the previous photo step(s).…”
Section: A Maintenance Staffing Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burton et al [2] evaluate various maintenance scheduling techniques using a simulation model of a hypothetical job 0894-6507/98$10.00 © 1998 IEEE shop. The authors conclude that maintenance scheduling rules are important, especially when an inefficient job scheduling rule is in use, maintenance resources are scarce, shop congestion is high, or PM tasks are scheduled frequently.…”
Section: Previous Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, preventive maintenance planning models tend to ignore the potential disruptions in production resulting from PM actions. Those that consider job schedules tend to ignore the possibility of revising a previously-determined production schedule based on machine availability considerations [14], [15].…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model determines the optimum number of operators to hire and train under the assumption of just-in-time, zero-inventory production. Burton et al [2] use a simulation model to evaluate several maintenance scheduling rules involving workload, shop capacity, job sequencing, and preventive maintenance policy in a dynamic job shop. They expect that a sufficient maintenance workforce would considerably improve job shop operation.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%