2020
DOI: 10.3390/su12145512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simultaneous Optimization Model for Airport Network Slot Allocation under Uncertain Capacity

Abstract: Serious congestion and delay problems exist in most of the busiest airports worldwide because of imbalance between scarce airport slot resources and increasing traffic demand. Various factors, especially weather conditions, exacerbate the demand–capacity imbalance. This paper presents a robust model for simultaneous slot allocation on an airport network in multiple calendar days, considering airport capacity uncertainty. The idea of robust optimization is conducive to sustainable and stable decision-ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, twice a year, a Slot Coordination conference takes place principally to resolve conflicts stemming from the timing of slots allocated across multiple airports [33]. The current contributions that address the allocation of airport slots at the network level are based on very strong simplifications that severely limit their applicability-only for single days and not in series [34], with computer-generated instances under a number of severely simplifying assumptions [35], or considering a network composed of only 3 airports in southern China [36]. An appropriate decomposition of the network, as proposed in this work, could foster the development of optimisation models that limit the use of face-to-face and manually conducted negotiations, as is the case today in the Slot Coordination conference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, twice a year, a Slot Coordination conference takes place principally to resolve conflicts stemming from the timing of slots allocated across multiple airports [33]. The current contributions that address the allocation of airport slots at the network level are based on very strong simplifications that severely limit their applicability-only for single days and not in series [34], with computer-generated instances under a number of severely simplifying assumptions [35], or considering a network composed of only 3 airports in southern China [36]. An appropriate decomposition of the network, as proposed in this work, could foster the development of optimisation models that limit the use of face-to-face and manually conducted negotiations, as is the case today in the Slot Coordination conference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e results show that the model effectively eliminates existing and potential scheduling conflicts and balances the airline preference and potential airport crowded risk [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Constraints (8) and (9) ensure that w arr it and w dep jt are non-increasing for each flight, consistently with their definition. Constraints (10) and (11) ensure that the aggregate number of scheduled arrivals and departures in each period t does not exceed the runway capacity limits. Constraint (12) defines the maximum of all positive and negative displacements for all incoming and outgoing flights, and finally, Constraint (13) defines the variables' type and sign constraints.…”
Section: F Depmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving airport capacity utilization is related to air traffic flow and capacity management (ATFCM), which tries to enhance the efficiency of operations by optimizing the allocation of airport resources for both arriving and departing aircrafts. Slot allocation is a key mechanism for achieving flowcapacity balance and dealing with airport congestion under airport-declared capacity constraints [11,12]. Many existing optimization models that are concerned with the effective use of runway systems have achieved increased utilization through the removal of slack times [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%