Abstract:SummaryA central feature of broad host range IncP-1 plasmids is the set of regulatory circuits that tightly control plasmid core functions under steady-state conditions. Cooperativity between KorB and either KorA or TrbA repressor proteins is a key element of these circuits and deletion analysis has implicated the conserved C-terminal domain of KorA and TrbA in this interaction. By NMR we show that KorA and KorB interact directly and identify KorA amino acids that are affected on KorB binding. Studies on mutan… Show more
“…Substitution W616A led to decreased amounts of NisB that could be co‐purified. Aromatic residues have been reported to play an important role in protein–protein interactions (Halperin et al ., 2004; Bingle et al ., 2008). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the highly conserved 18F in the leader peptide interacts with NisB through W616.…”
SummaryAlthough nisin is a model lantibiotic, our knowledge of the specific interactions of prenisin with its modification enzymes remains fragmentary. Here, we demonstrate that the nisin modification enzymes NisB and NisC can be pulled down in vitro from Lactococcus lactis by an engineered His-tagged prenisin. This approach enables us to determine important intermolecular interactions of prenisin with its modification machinery within L. lactis. We demonstrate that (i) NisB has stronger interactions with precursor nisin than NisC has, (ii) deletion of the propeptide part keeping the nisin leader intact leads to a lack of binding, (iii) NisB point mutants of highly conserved residues W616, F342A, Y346F and P639A are still able to dehydrate prenisin, (iv) NisB D(77-79)Y80F mutant decreased the levels of NisB-prenisin interactions and resulted in unmodified prenisin, (v) substitution of an active site residue H331A in NisC leads to higher amounts of the co-purified complex, (vi) NisB is present in the form of a dimer, and (vii) the region FNLD (-18 to -15) of the leader is an important site for binding not only to NisB, but also to NisC.
“…Substitution W616A led to decreased amounts of NisB that could be co‐purified. Aromatic residues have been reported to play an important role in protein–protein interactions (Halperin et al ., 2004; Bingle et al ., 2008). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the highly conserved 18F in the leader peptide interacts with NisB through W616.…”
SummaryAlthough nisin is a model lantibiotic, our knowledge of the specific interactions of prenisin with its modification enzymes remains fragmentary. Here, we demonstrate that the nisin modification enzymes NisB and NisC can be pulled down in vitro from Lactococcus lactis by an engineered His-tagged prenisin. This approach enables us to determine important intermolecular interactions of prenisin with its modification machinery within L. lactis. We demonstrate that (i) NisB has stronger interactions with precursor nisin than NisC has, (ii) deletion of the propeptide part keeping the nisin leader intact leads to a lack of binding, (iii) NisB point mutants of highly conserved residues W616, F342A, Y346F and P639A are still able to dehydrate prenisin, (iv) NisB D(77-79)Y80F mutant decreased the levels of NisB-prenisin interactions and resulted in unmodified prenisin, (v) substitution of an active site residue H331A in NisC leads to higher amounts of the co-purified complex, (vi) NisB is present in the form of a dimer, and (vii) the region FNLD (-18 to -15) of the leader is an important site for binding not only to NisB, but also to NisC.
“…Our previous study also showed that the domains of free KorB act independently, and that the protein exists in a wide range of dynamic conformations [ 21 ]. We have also examined the interaction of KorA with KorB and shown that this is mediated by the C-terminal dimerisation domain of KorA ( Figure 1C ) [ 14 ], as expected from its homology with TrbA [ 15 ]. Figure 1.…”
The ParB protein, KorB, from the RK2 plasmid is required for DNA partitioning and transcriptional repression. It acts co-operatively with other proteins, including the repressor KorA. Like many multifunctional proteins, KorB contains regions of intrinsically disordered structure, existing in a large ensemble of interconverting conformations. Using NMR spectroscopy, circular dichroism and small-angle neutron scattering, we studied KorB selectively within its binary complexes with KorA and DNA, and within the ternary KorA/KorB/DNA complex. The bound KorB protein remains disordered with a mobile C-terminal domain and no changes in the secondary structure, but increases in the radius of gyration on complex formation. Comparison of wild-type KorB with an N-terminal deletion mutant allows a model of the ensemble average distances between the domains when bound to DNA. We propose that the positive co-operativity between KorB, KorA and DNA results from conformational restriction of KorB on binding each partner, while maintaining disorder.
“…In the case of orf23p, the KorB-exerted repression is also subtle, and we cannot exclude the possibility that this promoter is regulated by another, as-yet-unrecognized protein. However, we could not detect any cooperativity between the primary repressors and KorB RA3 , in contrast to KorB RK2 interacting with two global repressors, KorA and TrbA (3,54,55). Cooperativity between repressor proteins may be important for medium-strength repressors in certain circumstances (4) but not valid for strong and weak repressors interfering with transcription at different levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…The regulation is achieved by autogenous repressors that produce negative-feedback loops, mediumrange repressors that control particular modules, and globally acting regulators that bind operators scattered along the plasmid molecule to coordinate expression of all modules. Fine-tuning of gene expression is postulated to be achieved by the action of corepressors and their cooperative binding in the promoter regions, which makes the plasmid highly responsive and facilitates its adaptation (1)(2)(3)(4).…”
The KorB protein of the broad-host-range conjugative plasmid RA3 from the IncU group belongs to the ParB family of plasmid and chromosomal segregation proteins. As a partitioning DNA-binding factor, KorB specifically recognizes a 16-bp palindrome which is an essential motif in the centromere-like sequence parS RA3 , forms a segrosome, and together with its partner IncC (ParA family) participates in active DNA segregation ensuring stable plasmid maintenance. Here we show that by binding to this palindromic sequence, KorB also acts as a repressor for the adjacent mobC promoter driving expression of the mobC-nic operon, which is involved in DNA processing during conjugation. Three other promoters, one buried in the conjugative transfer module and two divergent promoters located at the border between the replication and stability regions, are regulated by KorB binding
Large, low-copy-number plasmids displaying a broad host range (BHR) carry an extended backbone of operons involved in replication, copy number control, maintenance, and in the case of self-transmissible plasmids, also conjugative transfer. Expression of these genetic units is driven by high-activity promoters and therefore imposes a substantial metabolic cost on the bacterial cell. To minimize the metabolic burden to the host, regulatory networks have evolved to diminish the backbone gene expression to a low basal level while still allowing for rapid upregulation of the transcription when needed. The regulation is achieved by autogenous repressors that produce negative-feedback loops, mediumrange repressors that control particular modules, and globally acting regulators that bind operators scattered along the plasmid molecule to coordinate expression of all modules. Fine-tuning of gene expression is postulated to be achieved by the action of corepressors and their cooperative binding in the promoter regions, which makes the plasmid highly responsive and facilitates its adaptation (1-4).BHR plasmids from the incompatibility group IncU are widespread and ubiquitous in various aquatic environments, freshwater, fish farms, and clinical isolates (5-8). The modular-mosaic backbone of the IncU plasmids is extremely well conserved not only in its overall genetic organization but also at the nucleotide sequence level (8-10). The mosaic character of genomes from this group is demonstrated by homology of the functional blocks involved in replication, stable maintenance, and conjugative transfer to the respective functional modules of plasmids from different incompatibility groups. Thus, the stability region of RA3 encodes seven homologs of IncP-1 proteins (11), whereas the RA3 conjugative transfer region clusters with similarly organized modules from the PromA group of plasmids (12-16). The RA3 plasmid (Fig. 1), the group archetype isolated from the aquatic bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila (17), is the best-studied IncU representative. Its DNA sequence has been established (GenBank accession no. DQ401103) (10), and individual functional modules have been analyzed ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
