“…They felt the need for information regarding plasma studies in the newborn, elution studies, and low-incidence antibody testing, and stated that a positive newborn DAT is nondiagnostic and requires further evaluation, as even a negative maternal IAT does not preclude the possibility of HDFN to a lowincidence maternal alloantibody They went on to state that contemporary and historical literature of larger case series found that in HDFN caused by anti-M the neonatal DAT is more frequently negative than positive. [2][3][4] Therefore, the positive DAT cited by Beck et al could theoretically lower one's suspicion for the cause of HDFN being solely due to anti-M. Additionally, when discussing any case of HDFN, but especially with anti-M where the antibody's isotype and reacting temperature are questionable, the testing methods including platform technology, temperature, and enhancement media are vital to the discussion. They went on to state that although this case could be an important addition to the growing body of evidence supporting anti-M as a cause of HDFN, further investigation and reporting are required to definitively establish this conclusion.…”