2018
DOI: 10.1111/hae.13653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single‐centre study of management of pregnant women with von Willebrand disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it intuitively makes sense to check third trimester levels to decide on the type and intensity of prophylaxis at the time of active labor, it is still not clear that monitoring third trimester levels will fully reduce PPH in women with VWD. For example, in a recent single‐center retrospective study of 86 pregnancies in 55 women with VWD, all patients underwent third trimester monitoring, yet the incidence of primary PPH was 6.9%, similar to our findings in a population with much lower rates of screening . One cause of high rates of PPH despite third trimester monitoring may be current guidelines that recommend VWF replacement to > 50%, although recent studies suggest we are undertreating women with VWD with this approach and should rather be aiming closer to the levels of 150% to 200% that occur postpartum in the general population …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although it intuitively makes sense to check third trimester levels to decide on the type and intensity of prophylaxis at the time of active labor, it is still not clear that monitoring third trimester levels will fully reduce PPH in women with VWD. For example, in a recent single‐center retrospective study of 86 pregnancies in 55 women with VWD, all patients underwent third trimester monitoring, yet the incidence of primary PPH was 6.9%, similar to our findings in a population with much lower rates of screening . One cause of high rates of PPH despite third trimester monitoring may be current guidelines that recommend VWF replacement to > 50%, although recent studies suggest we are undertreating women with VWD with this approach and should rather be aiming closer to the levels of 150% to 200% that occur postpartum in the general population …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In retrospective studies, the incidence of PPH was reported as 1% to 3% in the general population, although in a recent prospective study 4.8% of women lost > 2000 mL of blood after childbirth . Prior studies indicate an incidence of PPH of 6% to 37% in women with VWD . There is scarce literature regarding the risk of HMB after childbirth because of resumption of menses in women with bleeding disorders.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…28,58,59 In the general population, secondary PPH rates are approximately 2% 84 ; however, for women with VWD, reported rates vary from 5 to 32% (►Table 2). 3,13,36,53,[85][86][87] Several factors combine to increase this risk. First, the pregnancy-induced rise in VWF and FVIII levels gradually reverses following delivery, with levels declining to baseline by 3 weeks postpartum.…”
Section: Postpartum Monitoring and Secondary Pph In Women With Vwdmentioning
confidence: 99%