1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf03050410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single domain grain model for the low-field constricted hysteresis loops of some basaltic rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal assumptions regarding the interpretation of Rayleigh loops have been that broad and constricted loops are indicative of the presence of significant concentrations of interacting hyperfine grains which exhibit VSP properties, with increasing constriction corresponding to an increasing degree of grain interaction [Radhakrishnamurthy and Sastry, 1970;Neel, 1970]. Specimens dominated by stable single-domain grains do not exhibit loops.…”
Section: Quadrature Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal assumptions regarding the interpretation of Rayleigh loops have been that broad and constricted loops are indicative of the presence of significant concentrations of interacting hyperfine grains which exhibit VSP properties, with increasing constriction corresponding to an increasing degree of grain interaction [Radhakrishnamurthy and Sastry, 1970;Neel, 1970]. Specimens dominated by stable single-domain grains do not exhibit loops.…”
Section: Quadrature Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are too narrow to be observed with our equipment [Deutsch and Piitzold, 1976]. Radhakrishnamurty and Sastry [1970] point out that since the BHe/A values (5-20) for their samples that showed wide loops exceed the theoretical MD values by two or three orders of magnitude, the actual loops are unlikely to be due to MD grains, a conclusion supported by N•el [1970].…”
Section: Rayleigh Constants and He Is The Bulk Coercivity; Such Loopsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…A further clue to the cause of large J, values in samples showing Rayleigh loops may be the fact that in 9 out of 17 samples from site 321 but in only one marginal case from hole 319A (sample 1-1,42-45) the loops were constricted (Figure 7). Radhakrishnamurty and Sastry [1970] and Ndel [1970] have attributed such constrictions to strong interaction in dense SP particle clusters. This should correspond to an intermediate case between SD and SP where one might expect both the remanence and the susceptibility to be large, as is indeed the case at site 321.…”
Section: Table 4) In Type I Samples the Most Striking Features Armentioning
confidence: 83%