2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16060917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single Nanobelt Transistor for Gas Identification: Using a Gas-Dielectric Strategy

Abstract: Despite tremendous potential and urgent demand in high-response low-cost gas identification, the development of gas identification based on a metal oxide semiconductor nanowire/nanobelt remains limited by fabrication complexity and redundant signals. Researchers have shown a multisensor-array strategy with “one key to one lock” configuration. Here, we describe a new strategy to create high-response room-temperature gas identification by employing gas as dielectric. This enables gas discrimination down to the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the NH 2 -IPSN-based FET was exposed to 100 ppm SO 2 , the responsivity (64%) was much smaller than that to 5 ppm NO 2 (2193%), even though SO 2 gas exhibits electron-donating nature, which is similar to NO 2 . This result is mainly attributed to the difference in electron affinity between SO 2 and NO 2 ; NO 2 gas, which has stronger electron affinity (2.27 eV), can induce more efficient charge transfer than SO 2 (1.11 eV) (Figure b). , Additionally, the NH 2 -IPSN-based FET did not respond noticeably to reducing gases (H 2 S and NH 3 ) with negative electron affinity (−1.16 and −2.0 eV, respectively). , This is because the reducing gases exhibit electron-donating nature, which is equivalent to inherent electrical property of the NH 2 groups, so that charge transfer between the molecules is not supposed to develop significantly. All the devices showed negligible responsivity to the nonpolar gas hexane, even at the highest concentration of 1000 ppm, because hexane could not induce charge transfer in PDPP-DTT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the NH 2 -IPSN-based FET was exposed to 100 ppm SO 2 , the responsivity (64%) was much smaller than that to 5 ppm NO 2 (2193%), even though SO 2 gas exhibits electron-donating nature, which is similar to NO 2 . This result is mainly attributed to the difference in electron affinity between SO 2 and NO 2 ; NO 2 gas, which has stronger electron affinity (2.27 eV), can induce more efficient charge transfer than SO 2 (1.11 eV) (Figure b). , Additionally, the NH 2 -IPSN-based FET did not respond noticeably to reducing gases (H 2 S and NH 3 ) with negative electron affinity (−1.16 and −2.0 eV, respectively). , This is because the reducing gases exhibit electron-donating nature, which is equivalent to inherent electrical property of the NH 2 groups, so that charge transfer between the molecules is not supposed to develop significantly. All the devices showed negligible responsivity to the nonpolar gas hexane, even at the highest concentration of 1000 ppm, because hexane could not induce charge transfer in PDPP-DTT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59,60 Additionally, the NH 2 -IPSN-based FET did not respond noticeably to reducing gases (H 2 S and NH 3 ) with negative electron affinity (−1.16 and −2.0 eV, respectively). 61,62 This is because the reducing gases exhibit electron-donating nature, which is equivalent to inherent electrical property of the NH 2 groups, so that charge transfer between the molecules is not supposed to develop significantly. All the devices showed negligible responsivity to the nonpolar gas hexane, even at the highest concentration of 1000 ppm, because hexane could not induce charge transfer in PDPP-DTT.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%