2006
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2006.tb00377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single Parameter Tunable Quaternion Based Attitude Estimation Filter

Abstract: In human posture tracking applications, limb segment attitude can be estimated without the aid of a generated source using small inexpensive inertial/magnetic sensor modules. In the absence of an adequate process model and process noise characteristics or in an application in which the dynamic and measurement relations are non‐linear, a simple complementary filter represents a computationally inexpensive solution that produces accurate attitude estimates superior to those of an improperly tuned Kalman filter. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [54], the filter was improved by introducing a more efficient computation of the correction step which made use of the orthogonality of the correction step to preserve the unity of the quaternion. Conditions for a tunable parameter was derived in [55] for the convergence of the filter within a reasonable time period as well as for the suppression of maneuver noise.…”
Section: Measurement Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [54], the filter was improved by introducing a more efficient computation of the correction step which made use of the orthogonality of the correction step to preserve the unity of the quaternion. Conditions for a tunable parameter was derived in [55] for the convergence of the filter within a reasonable time period as well as for the suppression of maneuver noise.…”
Section: Measurement Using Inertial and Magnetic Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both q and −q produce identical rotations, it is important to use both of these values in computing ∆q, which is the difference between the predicted and measured value for q that is used in drift correction, and to then choose the value for ∆q which is smaller in absolute value. This comparison is not necessary in some previous (less efficient and less accurate) approaches to drift correction [21] since these methods usually directly incorporate old estimates of q into estimation of ∆q, while this is not the case for the FQA estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For more information please visit [11]). iv Psiaki [21], Um et al [23], Bachmann et al [27], Elkaim [29], Gebre-Egziabher et al [28], Shin et al [31], Tome et al [34], Hirokawa et al [35], Jun [36] use ⊗ to denote quaternion product or spectrum convolution Soloviev et al [32]. We believe it is incorrect to use ⊗ to denote quaternion product or multiplication or spectrum convolution as this symbol is used to denote Kronecker product [46] or Tensor product [12].…”
Section: Appendix D: Special Cases Of Quaternionic Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%