2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11518-010-5128-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-period inventory system with a general S-shaped utility and exponential demand

Abstract: We discuss a single-period inventory system with a general S-shaped utility function and exponential demand. It is shown that there exists a state-dependent order-up-to policy to be optimal. Behaviors of optimal policy are illustrated by a numerical example.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Then an algorithm was devised to calculate the optimal policy in the multi-period case. Further, a general S-shaped utility function was used in Geng et al (2010). They assumed that demand is exponentially distributed and obtained the newsvendor’s optimal policy, which is similar to that found in Zhao et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then an algorithm was devised to calculate the optimal policy in the multi-period case. Further, a general S-shaped utility function was used in Geng et al (2010). They assumed that demand is exponentially distributed and obtained the newsvendor’s optimal policy, which is similar to that found in Zhao et al (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that a base stock policy is optimal. Geng et al (2010) treat an undiscounted version of the problem in which the decision-maker has an S-shaped utility function for aggregate profit over the horizon. They show that a state-dependent base stock policy is optimal.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen [3] researched the problem of custom parts purchase with loss aversion. Geng [4] studied a more general value function and used the S-index utility function to characterize the optimal behavior of loss-averse decision-makers. Our results also show that order-losers of decision-makers with loss aversion are lower than order-makers of risk-neutral policy makers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%