2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112702399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single unbranched S-phase DNA damage and replication fork blockage checkpoint pathway

Abstract: The eukaryotic intra-S-phase checkpoint, which slows DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage, is poorly understood. Is DNA damage recognized directly, or indirectly through its effects on replication forks? Is the slowing of S phase in part because of competition between DNA synthesis and recombination͞repair processes? The results of our genetic analyses of the intra-S-phase checkpoint in the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, suggest that the slowing of S phase depends weakly on the helicases Rqh1 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In S. pombe, most checkpoint studies have been carried out with the temperature-sensitive rad4 -116 allele of Rad4/ Cut5, the ortholog of S. cerevisiae Dpb11 and metazoan TopBP1. The central importance attributed to Rad4 in the intra S phase checkpoint in S. pombe could possibly in part be a consequence of defective replisome assembly, which may cause indirectly a defect in activation of Rad3 (ortholog of Mec1) (42). And although several other Rad4 mutants have been studied with various defects in DNA replication and checkpoint function (43), to our knowledge no Rad4/Cut5 mutants have been isolated that affect the C-terminal domain in which the Rad3-activation domain likely resides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In S. pombe, most checkpoint studies have been carried out with the temperature-sensitive rad4 -116 allele of Rad4/ Cut5, the ortholog of S. cerevisiae Dpb11 and metazoan TopBP1. The central importance attributed to Rad4 in the intra S phase checkpoint in S. pombe could possibly in part be a consequence of defective replisome assembly, which may cause indirectly a defect in activation of Rad3 (ortholog of Mec1) (42). And although several other Rad4 mutants have been studied with various defects in DNA replication and checkpoint function (43), to our knowledge no Rad4/Cut5 mutants have been isolated that affect the C-terminal domain in which the Rad3-activation domain likely resides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described under "Materials and Methods," G 1 -arrested cells were released into media containing 20 M CPT or 0.033% MMS. MMS is known to activate the intra-S-phase checkpoint by interfering with progression of replication fork progression (14,47,48), whereas CTP fails to do so (42). DNA was purified from the samples taken at regular (20 or 30 min) intervals after release.…”
Section: Unimpeded S-phase Progression Is Observed In Dna2⌬405n Follomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in Cds1-dependent slowing of DNA replication forks (Lindsay et al 1998;Marchetti et al 2002). However, Dcds1 mutants are only modestly sensitive to MMS treatment (Lindsay et al 1998;Marchetti et al 2002), suggesting at least partial independence from the replication checkpoint. In contrast, hsk1 and dfp1 C-terminal mutants are extremely MMS sensitive (Snaith et al 2000;Takeda et al 2001;Fung et al 2002;Matsumoto et al 2005;Sommariva et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in Cds1-dependent slowing of DNA replication forks (Lindsay et al 1998;Marchetti et al 2002). However, Dcds1 mutants are only modestly sensitive to MMS treatment (Lindsay et al 1998;Marchetti et al 2002), suggesting at least partial independence from the replication checkpoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%