2017
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2017002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A singular limit for an age structured mutation problem

Abstract: The spread of a particular trait in a cell population often is modelled by an appropriate system of ordinary differential equations describing how the sizes of subpopulations of the cells with the same genome change in time. On the other hand, it is recognized that cells have their own vital dynamics and mutations, leading to changes in their genome, mostly occurring during the cell division at the end of its life cycle. In this context, the process is described by a system of McKendrick type equations which r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main aim of this paper is to generalize the above results, both on the asymptotic behaviour of solutions to (6) and on the Euler-Hille type formula (7), to operators of the form B = K + C, where K is a contraction having 1 as an isolated eigenvalue, as well as to allow for the perturbation M in the transport terms. In particular, this generalization enabled an asymptotic analysis of a boundary perturbation of any network flow (1) with the node exchange rule given by the Kirchhoff rule.…”
Section: Example 2 Kimmel-stivers and Lebowitz-rubinow-rotenberg Modmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main aim of this paper is to generalize the above results, both on the asymptotic behaviour of solutions to (6) and on the Euler-Hille type formula (7), to operators of the form B = K + C, where K is a contraction having 1 as an isolated eigenvalue, as well as to allow for the perturbation M in the transport terms. In particular, this generalization enabled an asymptotic analysis of a boundary perturbation of any network flow (1) with the node exchange rule given by the Kirchhoff rule.…”
Section: Example 2 Kimmel-stivers and Lebowitz-rubinow-rotenberg Modmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(12)), it follows that the regular convergence of the semigroups solving (6) is equivalent to (7). We emphasize the role played by the regular convergence of the semigroup solving (6) in the proof of (7). As illustrated in Example 4, a direct proof would require a detailed knowledge of the fine structure of eigenvalues of the perturbed operator that seems to be difficult to obtain in a general case.…”
Section: Example 2 Kimmel-stivers and Lebowitz-rubinow-rotenberg Modmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations