1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7722(99)00014-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A site-scale model for fluid and heat flow in the unsaturated zone of Yucca Mountain, Nevada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different modeling approaches have been tested for handling fracture-matrix interaction at Yucca Mountain [7]. However, the DKM concept has been consistently used as the main modeling approach for simulating flow and transport in the UZ of Yucca Mountain [30], because of its ability to handle flow through both fracture and matrix continua.…”
Section: Numerical Model Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different modeling approaches have been tested for handling fracture-matrix interaction at Yucca Mountain [7]. However, the DKM concept has been consistently used as the main modeling approach for simulating flow and transport in the UZ of Yucca Mountain [30], because of its ability to handle flow through both fracture and matrix continua.…”
Section: Numerical Model Gridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual average surface temperature at Yucca Mountain was measured continuously for several years. Surface temperatures T s at any elevation Z are then computed as constants, according to the following equation [30]: …”
Section: Top Boundary Temperature Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the temporal change of water in the drift element represents the cumulative seepage collected in a capture system installed in the drift. The background percolation flux at the experimental site is extracted from the UZ site-scale model (Wu et al, 1999) and applied uniformly as a constant flux across the top model boundary. The fluxes of 2.54 mm/yr for Niche 3107 and 2.02 mm/yr for Niche 4788 are significantly lower than the injection flux applied during the liquid-release tests, and thus are not expected to greatly affect the simulation results.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the temporal change of water in the drift element represents the cumulative seepage collected in a capture system installed in the drift. The background percolation flux at the experimental site is extracted from the UZ site-scale model (Wu et al, 1999) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%