Towards a New Future in Engineering Education, New Scenarios That European Alliances of Tech Universities Open Up 2022
DOI: 10.5821/conference-9788412322262.1109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A situational judgement test for engineers to evaluate their professional strengths & weaknesses

Abstract: This paper reports on the development and evaluation of a 23 item Situational Judgement Test (SJT) with scenarios tailored to the engineering profession. The SJT was developed around the PREFER model, with the support of professional engineers and academics in 11 panel discussions. In total 53 engineering professionals and academics were consulted during the development of both the item stems and the item responses of the SJT. Subsequently, the SJT was rolled out to 334 final year and masters students enrolled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based upon the PREFER model, two innovative tests were developed: PREFER Explore is a personal preference test, aiming to inform students about the three professional roles and their personal preference for one (or two, three) of them [7], [38]. PREFER Match is a situational judgment test, aiming to trigger a process of reflection on students' drives by measuring to what extent engineering students are able to judge professional situations [8], [39].…”
Section: Knowing What To Become: the Prefer Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon the PREFER model, two innovative tests were developed: PREFER Explore is a personal preference test, aiming to inform students about the three professional roles and their personal preference for one (or two, three) of them [7], [38]. PREFER Match is a situational judgment test, aiming to trigger a process of reflection on students' drives by measuring to what extent engineering students are able to judge professional situations [8], [39].…”
Section: Knowing What To Become: the Prefer Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One main goal of the EER is to fill meet industry demands for engineering graduates with knowledge and professional skills (teamwork, communication, decision making, critical thinking, etc.) a acquired through educational approaches [14,15]. In general, SOTL tends to be more practitioner-oriented while EER tends to be more theory and research-oriented.…”
Section: Sotl Vs Eermentioning
confidence: 99%