2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: Repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
186
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
186
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference data for normal subjects have been collected. Although the obtained selected joint angle curves are in agreement with the literature (Leardini et al, 2007;Collins et al, 2009;Benedetti et al, 1998), caution is recommended when comparing the results among different protocols, especially in the case of non-sagittal planes (Ferrati et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reference data for normal subjects have been collected. Although the obtained selected joint angle curves are in agreement with the literature (Leardini et al, 2007;Collins et al, 2009;Benedetti et al, 1998), caution is recommended when comparing the results among different protocols, especially in the case of non-sagittal planes (Ferrati et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…4) are related to corresponding data derived from similar biomechanical models (Benedetti et al, 1998;Leardini et al, 2007;Collins et al, 2009). The lowest consistency of the range of motion (ROM) is observed for the ankle angle, for which the anatomical frame definition and the marker set differ considerably from other models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Full-body kinematics were collected throughout three consecutive 10 s periods within each condition (8 min into the walk) using retro-reflective markers placed on bony landmarks and according to a modified Cleveland Clinic marker set [19]. Marker positions were collected (120 Hz) using at least an 8-camera motion capture system (Motion Analysis Corporation; Santa Rosa, California, or Vicon; Oxford, United Kingdom).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMC values range between 0 and 1, with values above 0.8 suggesting a high degree of reproducibility and values approaching zero indicating low reproducibility [38][39]. CMC values were also calculated for the hip joint angular data and for the GRF data for the individuals with TFA.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%