2003
DOI: 10.1002/art.10717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A six‐month randomized, controlled, double‐blind, dose‐response comparison of intravenous pamidronate (60 mg versus 10 mg) in the treatment of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug–refractory ankylosing spondylitis: Comment on the article by Maksymowych et al

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 In addition, aminobisphosphonates also show immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity by interacting with proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, the tumour necrosis factor and IL-6, and therefore inhibiting the antigen-presenting capacity of macrophages. [39][40][41][42] What this different mode of action implicates for the clinical potential in the treatment of HO is unknown. Thus, the new generation of bisphosphonates may produce less osteomalacia but theoretically may also have a lower potential of inhibiting HO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…58 In addition, aminobisphosphonates also show immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity by interacting with proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1, the tumour necrosis factor and IL-6, and therefore inhibiting the antigen-presenting capacity of macrophages. [39][40][41][42] What this different mode of action implicates for the clinical potential in the treatment of HO is unknown. Thus, the new generation of bisphosphonates may produce less osteomalacia but theoretically may also have a lower potential of inhibiting HO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, recent studies and case reports support its efficacy in different inflammatory, dysmorphogenic bone disease such as diabetic neuropathy (Charcot), reflex sympathetic dystrophy (M Sudeck), ankylosing spondylitis, or the SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis). [39][40][41][42][43]61,62 In these inflammatory syndromes of largely unknown cause and pathophysiology, amino-bisphosphonates are administered not only because of their antiosteoclastic effect, but rather for their immunomodulatory and antiinflammatory properties. If bisphosphonate therapy has been suggested to control bone metabolism activity in these multiple destructive inflammatory bone conditions, it is reasonable to believe that it may have a role in controlling osteoblast and osteoclastic activity in the acute inflammatory phase of HO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 AS patients treated with bisphosphonate achieve similar reductions in disease activity, which take the BASDAI and other clinical index as efficacy measure, compared with anti-inflammatory therapy and benefits to bone mineral density. 27 Treatment with bisphosphonates either improves the clinical index or ameliorated radiological progression in AS patients, [28][29][30][31] regardless of whether a short-term 28 or intermittent treatment was adopted. 29 Therefore, bony formation in AS not only originates from enthesitis; osteoclasts also play an important role in structural disease progression although the underlying mechanism has yet to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%