2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508)
DOI: 10.1109/cacsd.2004.1393894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A skew mu toolbox (SMT) for robustness analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be easily checked using a dedicated software [4] and is supposed to hold throughout the paper. Note that µ-analysis is not broached as such in this paper due to space limitations, but a good introduction to this technique can be found in [13], [14].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be easily checked using a dedicated software [4] and is supposed to hold throughout the paper. Note that µ-analysis is not broached as such in this paper due to space limitations, but a good introduction to this technique can be found in [13], [14].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the exact computation of the worstcase H ∞ performance is NP hard, an estimation can thus be obtained by computing skewed-µ upper and lower bounds. Several upper bounds exist [2], [3] and efficient algorithms have been implemented [4]. On the other hand, results are quite mixed concerning lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added benefit is that the new uncertainty structure XiC is always mixed (contains real and complex uncertainty) and efficient computation of upper and lower bounds for "mixed" IL are well developed and commercially available [6]. The authors also recommend using the Skew Mu Toolbox for use with Matlab that is freely downloadable [7]. Figure 5, the pre-filter Hr is set to 1, the influences of disturbances d and noise n are ignored for the initial analysis and the perturbed plant P is determined using (7).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robust model can then be transformed into a generic M − ∆ form as shown in Figure 2 where the ∆ block contains all of the introduced normalized uncertain parameters. Transformation into this generic form can be performed mathematically, by block diagram and/or by using dedicated software tools [3]- [5].…”
Section: Robust Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%