2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SKOS-based multilingual thesaurus of geological time scale for interoperability of online geological maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following up on the continuous stakeholder engagement, a workgroup was formed to formalize the emerging standards for hydro‐climate and general observation data federation in New Zealand and develop the New Zealand Environmental Observation Data Profile (EODP) into a standardization document. The profile refines existing information and web service specifications published by the OGC, and vocabulary data standards defined by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (Ma et al ). The only scenario supported directly by this document is data discovery where the services and their responses act as indexes – providing the minimum required information to locate observation data for a phenomenon in space and time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Following up on the continuous stakeholder engagement, a workgroup was formed to formalize the emerging standards for hydro‐climate and general observation data federation in New Zealand and develop the New Zealand Environmental Observation Data Profile (EODP) into a standardization document. The profile refines existing information and web service specifications published by the OGC, and vocabulary data standards defined by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (Ma et al ). The only scenario supported directly by this document is data discovery where the services and their responses act as indexes – providing the minimum required information to locate observation data for a phenomenon in space and time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Efforts to design and integrate vocabularies in more specific application domains have been developed. Some examples may be found in meteorology (http://cfconventions.org/index.html), oceanography [46], environment (https://www.eionet.europa.eu/gemet/), geology [47] and mineral exploration [48].…”
Section: Geospatial Smart Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those structures should enable the efficient integrated storage (in terms of space) and the efficient access (in terms of response time) to vector and raster observation and modeling results with all the required dataset level and record level metadata. Finally, the semantic integration of already existing vocabularies such as SWEET [14], CF, GEMET, and other [46][47][48] should be enabled by the system, to foster semantic interoperability between data sources and applications.…”
Section: Challenge 3: Environmental Observation and Modeling Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the properties "skos:prefLabel" and "skos:altLabel" from SKOS, each concept in the vocabulary of geologic time scale can have labels in several languages (Ma et al, 2011). A key reason for this study to reuse the vocabulary developed by Cox and Richard (2015) is that it includes labels in more than 20 languages.…”
Section: Knowledge Base Datasets and Technological Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%