1984
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(84)90007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sm-Nd isotopic study of atmospheric dusts and particulates from major river systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
646
3
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,571 publications
(695 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
37
646
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…DePaolo (1981), whereby the evolution of the DM is given by: eNd(T)DM = 0.25T^2 -3T ? 8.5 and iteration versus the eNd(T) of the sample provides T DM 1 (T in Ga); (b) T DM 2 is a one-stage model calculated assuming a linear Nd isotopic growth of the DM from eNd = 0 at 4.56 to ?10 at the present (Goldstein et al 1984 (Vervoort and Patchett 1996). Fig.…”
Section: Whole-rock Nd-sr Isotope Analysesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…DePaolo (1981), whereby the evolution of the DM is given by: eNd(T)DM = 0.25T^2 -3T ? 8.5 and iteration versus the eNd(T) of the sample provides T DM 1 (T in Ga); (b) T DM 2 is a one-stage model calculated assuming a linear Nd isotopic growth of the DM from eNd = 0 at 4.56 to ?10 at the present (Goldstein et al 1984 (Vervoort and Patchett 1996). Fig.…”
Section: Whole-rock Nd-sr Isotope Analysesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The gray field represents of the Sa'al schist represent the evolution from the maximum age of this rock at 1.0 Ga (Be'eri- Shlevin et al 2009c). G DM and D DM are the depleted mantle evolutionary curves according to models of Goldstein et al (1984) and DePaolo (1981) respectively. TPG Timna porphyritic granite.…”
Section: Whole-rock Sr-nd Isotope Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8). Samples GH-04, GH-06 and GH-11 presented negative εNd(t = 1,218) values ranging from -3.09 to -4.22, Nd T DM model age from 1.76 to 1.86 Ga, and fractionation factor (f Sm/Nd) between -0.48 and -0.50, calculated using the equation of Goldstein et al (1984). In general, these values are typical of crustal sources generated in the late Paleoproterozoic, during the Statherian period.…”
Section: Whole-rock Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%