2020
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019104337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A small targeting domain in Ty1 integrase is sufficient to direct retrotransposon integration upstream of tRNA genes

Abstract: Integration of transposable elements into the genome is mutagenic. Mechanisms targeting integrations into relatively safe locations, hence minimizing deleterious consequences for cell fitness, have emerged during evolution. In budding yeast, integration of the Ty1 LTR retrotransposon upstream of RNA polymerase III (Pol III)‐transcribed genes requires interaction between Ty1 integrase (IN1) and AC40, a subunit common to Pol I and Pol III. Here, we identify the Ty1 targeting domain of IN1 that ensures (i) IN1 bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(156 reference statements)
11
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TEs have maximized their chance of propagation because of an accurate control of integration events specifically targeting non-deleterious regions of the genome. This is the case for Ty1, which targets its integration upstream of Pol III-transcribed genes through direct interactions between IN and Pol III (11,12). The architecture that we reveal with our SAXS model and Interestingly, the folded N-terminal half and the intrinsically disordered C-terminal regions of Ty1 IN appear to act independently.…”
Section: Sso7d-in Shows a Behavior In Terms Of Integration And Disintegration Activities Similarmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TEs have maximized their chance of propagation because of an accurate control of integration events specifically targeting non-deleterious regions of the genome. This is the case for Ty1, which targets its integration upstream of Pol III-transcribed genes through direct interactions between IN and Pol III (11,12). The architecture that we reveal with our SAXS model and Interestingly, the folded N-terminal half and the intrinsically disordered C-terminal regions of Ty1 IN appear to act independently.…”
Section: Sso7d-in Shows a Behavior In Terms Of Integration And Disintegration Activities Similarmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The Ty1 mRNA is then reverse transcribed by RT into a linear doublestranded DNA copy (cDNA). IN binds to the cDNA to form the pre-integration complex, which migrates into the nucleus where the cDNA is integrated into the host genome (6), preferentially upstream of Pol III-transcribed genes (7)(8)(9)(10) through a direct interaction between IN and Pol III (11,12). Previous studies suggest that, like retroviruses, Ty1 integration process is carried out by complexes composed of multiple copies of IN assembled on the LTR DNA ends, commonly called intasomes (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ty1 mobility was measured as previously described in [91]. Briefly, four independent clones of strains harboring a Ty1-his3AI chromosomal reporter were grown to saturation for 24h at 30°C in liquid YPD.…”
Section: Retrotransposition Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the comparison of the two structures reveals that the Ty3 intasome and Pol III would occupy nearly the exact same position, thus providing mechanistic evidence that Pol III transcription and Ty3 integration are mutually exclusive, as previously postulated by studies suggesting competition between the two processes 48,63 . Unlike Ty3, Ty1 retrotransposon integrates at nucleosomal DNA and requires a physical association with the Pol III enzyme 13,14,64 rationalising why Ty3 and Ty1 do not compete for the same integration sites.…”
Section: Ty3 Integration and Rna Pol III Transcription Are Mutually Exclusivementioning
confidence: 99%