2016
DOI: 10.1002/mop.29871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smaller step impedance line Wilkinson power divider with an improved better stop-band

Abstract: This article proposes the stepped impedance line Wilkinson power divider (SIL WPD) and extracts the design formulae of SIL WPD. In the process of forming the WPD and executing a simulation based on the calculated design parameters, this study found that the SIL WPD improves stop‐band performance compared to the conventional one. In addition, it is useful in reducing the size due to the characteristics of SIL. Finally, the consistency of the simulated and measured results confirmed the validity of the SIL struc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This resulted in a size reduction of 44% compared to the conventional Wilkinson power divider at the same center frequency; however, fractional bandwidth (FBW) is reduced by 8%. Therefore, in order to improve the reduction of bandwidth and get more size reduction, stepped-impedance transmission line is used [7], [8], [24], [28].…”
Section: Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This resulted in a size reduction of 44% compared to the conventional Wilkinson power divider at the same center frequency; however, fractional bandwidth (FBW) is reduced by 8%. Therefore, in order to improve the reduction of bandwidth and get more size reduction, stepped-impedance transmission line is used [7], [8], [24], [28].…”
Section: Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The desired total electrical length, θ t = θ 1 + θ 2 is less than 45° at center frequency of 2.4 GHz [7]. The impedance ratio, Z 2 /Z 1 = K of SITL can reduce the length when K > 1 [7], [24]. The equations from (1) to (6) in Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Designmentioning
confidence: 99%