2018
DOI: 10.1002/ett.3279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smart ACO‐inspired named data networking forwarding scheme with clustering analysis

Abstract: Different from the traditional IP network, named data networking (NDN) performs the stateful and adaptive forwarding, which faces some severe challenges such as efficient and self‐organized content retrieval. The current proposals are very difficult to address such challenges; therefore, this paper proposes a novel and smart NDN forwarding scheme by introducing both ant colony optimization and clustering analysis. At first, the discrete content concentration model is established with network load to address in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that ACOIR has the largest ARD, followed by CRSCD and RISC. In fact, the intelligent method to solve some problems in CCN routing consumes too much time; regarding this, it has been demonstrated in the works of Lv et al Inevitably, ACOIR always uses ACO and CRSCD uses ACO for intracommunity routing, both of them consumes too much ARD than RISC. For CRSCD and ACOIR, although they introduce ACO to solve CCN routing, we observe that ARD of ACOIR reaches up to 120 ms, whereas that of CRSCD reaches a low of 13 ms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observe that ACOIR has the largest ARD, followed by CRSCD and RISC. In fact, the intelligent method to solve some problems in CCN routing consumes too much time; regarding this, it has been demonstrated in the works of Lv et al Inevitably, ACOIR always uses ACO and CRSCD uses ACO for intracommunity routing, both of them consumes too much ARD than RISC. For CRSCD and ACOIR, although they introduce ACO to solve CCN routing, we observe that ARD of ACOIR reaches up to 120 ms, whereas that of CRSCD reaches a low of 13 ms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a number of pure CCN routing proposals, which have been reviewed in related works . However, in order to save space and avoid redundancy, in this section, we only review CCN routing about its integration with SDN or/and community division, especially some work published in the last three years.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [33], an edge caching with mobility prediction was proposed, which put the contents at the edge CRs as many as possible. In [34], a centrality-measures based scheme was proposed to select the core CRs; and in [35] the densitybased spatial clustering was exploited to detect the core CRs, which put the contents at the intermediate CRs. Different from [33]- [36] fully considered their advantages and proposed a heuristic greedy strategy, which cached the most popular contents at the edge CRs, recalculated the relative popularity of each piece based on the request miss stream and then determined the contents to be cached at the core CRs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, the node load tends to be unbalanced. In order to improve the performance of built-in CCN caching strategies, some optimization schemes have been proposed, i.e., cache management mechanisms including where/which/how the contents are cached and how many contents are cached [8]. In spite of showing efficient performance, they are usually designed based on the context where all CRs have the same cache size [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is insufficient to optimize the overall network performance that only the heterogeneous cache location is devised. As we know, the collaborative caching among CRs is also of great necessity [8] because it is almost impossible for the independent caching without interaction to facilitate the optimal performance. For example, given some contents stored at CR 1 and CR 2 , it is required to determine which contents are cached at CR 1 and CR 2 respectively by the collaborative manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%