2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19112487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smart Phone Based Handheld Wireless Spirometer with Functions and Precision Comparable to Laboratory Spirometers

Abstract: We report a smart phone based handheld wireless spirometer which uses a Lilly type sensing flowhead for respiratory signal acquisition and transmits the data to smartphone or other mobile terminals with Bluetooth signal transmission for data processing and result display. The developed spirometer was demonstrated to be able to detect flow rates ranging from 0–15 L/s with an accuracy of 4 mL/s, and can perform tests of flow volume (FV), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), peak e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An open architecture reconfigurable respiration monitor was proposed in [ 27 ] using an off-the-shelf airflow sensor and other gas composite sensors to perform PFTs, with a Pearson correlation of 0.94. In [ 28 ], a wireless hand-held pneumotachograph spirometer was developed, showing a 3% error for FVC and a 10% error for PEF values.…”
Section: Background and State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open architecture reconfigurable respiration monitor was proposed in [ 27 ] using an off-the-shelf airflow sensor and other gas composite sensors to perform PFTs, with a Pearson correlation of 0.94. In [ 28 ], a wireless hand-held pneumotachograph spirometer was developed, showing a 3% error for FVC and a 10% error for PEF values.…”
Section: Background and State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to compare the calibration results in this paper with those obtained using a precision smart-phone based spirometer [19]. Conceptually, the two systems are similar with Zhou et al selecting to use a commercial Lilly screen with a flow restrictor (R = 3.3 × 10 4 Pa per m 3 /s) matched to the differential pressure sensor dynamic range of 0 to 500 Pa, to cater for flow rates up to 15 L/s.…”
Section: Comparison With a Lilly Based Spirometermentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A group at Oxford University are developing a whistle, the frequency of which is proportional to airflow, while researchers at the University of Washington have developed a device called SpiroSmart that relies on processing data from a smartphone microphone [18]. Another smartphone based device developed to meet the accuracy requirements published by the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society uses a Lilly pneumotachograph, a precision differential pressure transducer, a Bluetooth link with a processor and display app [19]. In contrast to these examples, our objective was to develop a similarly sensitive pneumotachograph that could be easily manufactured by hand for less than $1 in the developing country, with few resources, but could still be interfaced to any cellphone.…”
Section: Using the Cellphone Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, there has been increased reliance on home spirometry for collection of PFT data, which are then communicated by the patient to the clinic. Electronic home spirometers have been shown to be equivalent to laboratory-based spirometry and more affordable, 23,24 and the benefits of weekly home spirometry have been discussed as an alternative to quarterly inperson measurements for CF. 25 Future studies will need to assess the effectiveness of these methods and explore alternative solutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%