2020
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1802457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smoker’s choice? Identifying the most autonomy-supportive message frame in an online computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention

Abstract: Objective: To test the effect of autonomy-supportive message framing on people's perceived autonomy-support while considering the individual need for autonomy as a moderator. Also, to test whether autonomy-supportive message framesthrough increased perceived autonomy-support -lead to more self-determined motivation, and increased intention to quit smoking. Design: An online 2(autonomy-supportive; controlling language) Â 2(choice; no choice) between-subjects design with control condition (generic advice) with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(76 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-determined motivation to perform safer sex was measured using a version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Levesque et al, 2007) to measure to which degree participants would perform the health behaviour for autonomous, self-determined reasons, or for controlled reasons as used by Altendorf et al (2021). To limit participant burden in the rather young sample of participants, six items were used in the questionnaire, instead of the 16 used by Altendorf et al (2021). Therefore, (1) three items were chosen to measure autonomous regulation and (2) three items to measure controlled regulation.…”
Section: Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-determined motivation to perform safer sex was measured using a version of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (Levesque et al, 2007) to measure to which degree participants would perform the health behaviour for autonomous, self-determined reasons, or for controlled reasons as used by Altendorf et al (2021). To limit participant burden in the rather young sample of participants, six items were used in the questionnaire, instead of the 16 used by Altendorf et al (2021). Therefore, (1) three items were chosen to measure autonomous regulation and (2) three items to measure controlled regulation.…”
Section: Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of feedback messages for the 4 message frames are presented in Table 1. For more examples, refer to the study by Altendorf et al [31].…”
Section: Integrate Message Frames In the Program And Conduct A Second...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a web-based experiment with a 2×2 (language: autonomy-supportive vs controlling; choice vs no choice) between-participants design with a control condition was conducted. An extensive description of the method and results of this experiment is provided elsewhere [31]. However, we summarize the most important outcomes below.…”
Section: Conduct a 2×2 Web-based Experiments With A Control Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different versions of the TSRQ have been adapted in various studies (22)(23)(24)(25) to examine the effect of autonomous regulation on distinct behaviors e.g. lifestyle changes in patients with chest pain (26), physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (27)(28), dietary habits (1,15,(22)(23), physical activity (1,29), drinking behavior (30), smoking (1,(31)(32) and weight loss practices (12,33). Consistent with these studies' importance of autonomous regulation on diabetes control, care and self-management, positive lifestyle changes, therapeutic adherence and regular physical activity, diet change, blood glucose control and stress control were studied (3-4, 8, 12-13, 17, 33-43).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%