2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3020789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smooth Nonparametric, Multivariate, Mixed-Data Location-Scale Test

Abstract: A number of tests have been proposed for assessing the location-scale assumption that is often invoked by practitioners. Existing approaches include Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von-Mises statistics that each involve measures of divergence between unknown joint distribution functions and products of marginal distributions. In practice, the unknown distribution functions embedded in these statistics are approximated using non-smooth empirical distribution functions. We demonstrate how replacing the non-smooth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is obtained by replacing F Z j ,n in the classical tests with a smoothed version. As shown in [34], these type of tests have better power and are overall better when data show a more discrete behaviour. The smooth tests are close to the classical F Z j ,n -based test as shown in [41] and asymptotically equivalent in terms of ef-ficiency (see [4]).…”
Section: Pokémon Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is obtained by replacing F Z j ,n in the classical tests with a smoothed version. As shown in [34], these type of tests have better power and are overall better when data show a more discrete behaviour. The smooth tests are close to the classical F Z j ,n -based test as shown in [41] and asymptotically equivalent in terms of ef-ficiency (see [4]).…”
Section: Pokémon Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimator of the error distribution has been shown to be very useful for testing hypotheses regarding several features of model (1.1), like e.g. testing for the form of the regression function m(•) (Van Keilegom et al (2008)), comparing regression curves (Pardo-Fernández et al (2007)), testing independence between ε and X (Einmahl and Van Keilegom (2008) and Racine and Van Keilegom (2017)), testing for symmetry of the error distribution (Koul (2002), Neumeyer and Dette (2007)), among others. The idea in each of these papers is to compare an estimator of the error distribution obtained under the null hypothesis with an estimator that is not based on the null.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%