2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A SNP-based PCR–RFLP capillary electrophoresis analysis for the identification of the varietal origin of olive oils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40,41 Among the six SNPs used in the identification key, three were reported in previous work. SNP2, identified in the Chalcone synthase gene, was reported by Consolandi et al 25 SNP5, identified in the Cycloarthenol synthase gene, was also reported by Consolandi et al, 25 and Bazakos et al 21 In addition, we found that the SNP in the Calcium binding protein gene, first described by Reale et al, 24 was also polymorphic in Turkish germplasm and is referred to as SNP6 in this study. These results demonstrate that SNPs in olive coding sequences are conserved across the geography of olive distribution and can be useful for estimating ancestral alleles via phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural and Food Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…40,41 Among the six SNPs used in the identification key, three were reported in previous work. SNP2, identified in the Chalcone synthase gene, was reported by Consolandi et al 25 SNP5, identified in the Cycloarthenol synthase gene, was also reported by Consolandi et al, 25 and Bazakos et al 21 In addition, we found that the SNP in the Calcium binding protein gene, first described by Reale et al, 24 was also polymorphic in Turkish germplasm and is referred to as SNP6 in this study. These results demonstrate that SNPs in olive coding sequences are conserved across the geography of olive distribution and can be useful for estimating ancestral alleles via phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Journal Of Agricultural and Food Chemistrysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Regarding monovarietal olive oil classification according to olive cultivar, other approaches have been described in the literature, reporting in some cases slightly less accurate correct classification performances (ranging from 70 to 100 %) depending on the analytical technique used (e.g., NMR, NIR, and MIR spectroscopy; PTR-MS; HS-SPME-GC/MS; SNP-based PCR-RFLP capillary electrophoresis; SNP-based CAPS assays), the number of olive cultivars under study (3,5, or 10 cultivars) and chemometric tool used (e.g., LDA PLS-DA and canonical discriminant analysis) [13,14,22,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Low-level Data Fusion Of Sensory Attributes and E-tongue Sigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sensory evaluation is mainly used to classify olive oils as LOO, VOO, or EVOO according to their positive and/or negative organoleptic sensations. In the last years, several analytical approaches, ranging from expensive chromatographic [2,6,[9][10][11][12][13]]-, DNA [14]-, or nondestructive spectroscopy [15,16]-based methods to fast and low-cost electrochemical devices [3,13,[17][18][19], have been reported. These methods showed satisfactory predictive performances regarding olive oil quality assessment and classification, including the successful Abstract Olive oil quality grading is traditionally assessed by human sensory evaluation of positive and negative attributes (olfactory, gustatory, and final olfactorygustatory sensations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic value of olive oils make this food product very prone to fraud, including mislabeling of olive oil commercial category, geographical or olive cultivar origin [3][4][5][6][7]. So, several gas-, liquid-and mass-spectrometry chromatography, DNA and spectroscopy based methods have been developed to assess olive oil quality and authenticity as well as to detect possible adulterations [3,5,6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Electrochemical sensors have also been extensively used, including electronic noses and electronic tongues (E-tongues), individually or in combination, mainly with the aim of identifying possible adulterations or classifying olive oils according to quality level, geographical origin or olive cultivar [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%