A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on.

Abstract

These meta-analyses of 60+ years of social comparison research focused on 2 issues: the choice of a comparison target (selection) and the effects of comparisons on self-evaluations, affect, and so forth (reaction). Selection studies offering 2 options (up or down) showed a strong preference (and no evidence of publication bias) for upward choices when there was no threat; there was no evidence for downward comparison as a dominant choice even when threatened. Selections became less differentiable when a lateral choice was also provided. For reaction studies, contrast was, by far, the dominant response to social comparison, with ability estimates most strongly affected. Moderator analyses, tests and adjustments for publication bias showed that contrast is stronger when the comparison involves varying participants' standing for ability (effect estimates, -0.75 to -0.65) and affect (-0.83 to -0.65). Novel personal attributes were subject to strong contrast for ability (-0.5 to -0.6) and affect (-0.6 to -0.7). Dissimilarity priming was associated with contrast (-0.44 to -0.27; no publication bias), consistent with Mussweiler (2003). Similarity priming provided modest support for Collins (1996) and Mussweiler (2003), with very weak assimilation effects, depending on the publication bias estimator. Studies including control groups indicated effects in response to upward and downward targets were comparable in size and contrastive. Limitations of the literature (e.g., small number of studies including no-comparison control conditions), unresolved issues, and why people choose to compare upward when the most likely result is self-deflating contrast are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

The role of optimism, self‐esteem, and self‐efficacy in moderating the relation between health comparisons and subjective well‐being: Results of a nationally representative longitudinal study among older adults

“…The reference group in the study conducted by Ferrer-i-Carbonell contained individuals with (1) similar educational level, (2) similar age bracket, and (3) living in the same region. Beginning in 1954 when Festinger (1954) proposed this theory, there is also a longstanding tradition in investigating social comparisons (comparisons between the self and others) in social and personality psychology (Gerber, Wheeler, & Suls, 2018). According to that theory, social comparisons are an important psychological mechanism that affects the behaviour, experiences, and judgement of individuals.…”

Trabalho digno expressando valores universais e respeitando diversidade cultural: Proposições para a intervenção

“…Social comparison processes concerning the use of others as a comparison term for self-evaluation (Festinger, 1954) can play a role in evaluating decent work conditions. People tend to compare with others whether upward or downward in ranking dimensions (Gerber, Wheeler, & Suls, 2018). Comparisons are made of contents beyond those originally proposed by Festinger, i.e., abilities and opinions, and include life satisfaction, standard of living, wages, opportunities and others (Kruglanski & Mayseless, 1990).…”

How Financial Constraints Influence Consumer Behavior: An Integrative Framework

“…Consumers have a fundamental motivation to attain status (Griskevicius & Kenrick, 2013), which leads them to be particularly attuned to how their own status compares to that of others (Corcoran, Crusius, & Mussweiler, 2011;Festinger, 1954). A recent meta-analysis showed that consumers predominantly tend to make upward comparisons (Gerber, Wheeler, & Suls, 2018), suggesting that consumers most often compare themselves to others who have more financial resources than they do.…”