2001
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01941.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Social Constructivism Model of Ethical Decision Making in Counseling

Abstract: Social constructivism is defined as an intellectual movement in the mental health field that directs a social consensual inter pretation of reality. A social constructivism approach redefines the ethical decision-making process as an interactive rather than an individual or intrapsychic process. The process involves negotiating, consensualizing, and, when necessary, arbitrating. Counselors are guided by social and cultural factors in defining what is acceptable ethical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
90
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is evidence in the rehabilitation counseling literature that professional maintenance training programs have been successful in incorporating the kinds of challenges actually confronted by practicing rehabilitation counselors that would be necessary to make the training experience more meaningful (Wilson et al, 1991). Cottone (2001) noted that only recently ethical decisionmaking models that account for social factors had begun to appear in the literature. Cottone, Tarvydas, and Claus (2007) reviewed ethical decision-making models and noted that the majority did not account for contextual factors in the model.…”
Section: Credentialing Body Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there is evidence in the rehabilitation counseling literature that professional maintenance training programs have been successful in incorporating the kinds of challenges actually confronted by practicing rehabilitation counselors that would be necessary to make the training experience more meaningful (Wilson et al, 1991). Cottone (2001) noted that only recently ethical decisionmaking models that account for social factors had begun to appear in the literature. Cottone, Tarvydas, and Claus (2007) reviewed ethical decision-making models and noted that the majority did not account for contextual factors in the model.…”
Section: Credentialing Body Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For a review of ethical decision making models in the counseling and development context, one should read Cottone and Claus (2000). More recently, in this area Cottone (2001) has introduced the Social Constructivism model for ethical decision making while Garcia et al (2003) have proposed the Transcultural Integrative model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this population, family, gender role and the eating disordered cultures are particularly relevant. This model also incorporates aspects from both Cottone's (2001) social constructivist and Davis' (1997) collaborative models. We subscribe to this particular model because it incorporates Cottone's theory-driven social constructivist model which purports that ethical decision-making results from interpersonal exchanges and agreement upon what is fact.…”
Section: Concerns With a Purely Principle Ethics Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We subscribe to this particular model because it incorporates Cottone's theory-driven social constructivist model which purports that ethical decision-making results from interpersonal exchanges and agreement upon what is fact. Cottone's (2001) model rightly places the decision-making process within an interpersonal, social context involving the processes of negotiating (i.e. the ensuing discussion when a disagreement on an issue exists among individuals), consensualizing (i.e.…”
Section: Concerns With a Purely Principle Ethics Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%