2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

56
1,515
8
68

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,749 publications
(1,647 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
56
1,515
8
68
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with De Vries et al (2012). The information content describes the ability of a fan page to provide information that acts as an important reason for people to use social networking sites (Liao et al, 2011), to participate in virtual communities (Dholakia et al, 2004), to contribute to Facebook (Park et al, 2009), and consume content about related brands (Muntinga et al, 2011). Therefore, based on the findings of the research, the study concluded that individuals would have more positive attitudes towards informative fan pages, as compared to noninformative ones.…”
Section: Journal Of Indonesian Economy and Business Maysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This finding is consistent with De Vries et al (2012). The information content describes the ability of a fan page to provide information that acts as an important reason for people to use social networking sites (Liao et al, 2011), to participate in virtual communities (Dholakia et al, 2004), to contribute to Facebook (Park et al, 2009), and consume content about related brands (Muntinga et al, 2011). Therefore, based on the findings of the research, the study concluded that individuals would have more positive attitudes towards informative fan pages, as compared to noninformative ones.…”
Section: Journal Of Indonesian Economy and Business Maysupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Our results are different from those of previous research (e.g., Moore & Benbasat, 1991;Venkatesh & Davis, 2000;AbuShanab & Pearson, 2007;Martins et al, 2014), because our sampling targets are experienced users. Researchers have indicated that people emphasize on various benefits when using a VC to search for cosmetic products (e.g., Athiyaman, 2002;Dholakia, Bagozzi, & Pearo, 2004). When members are familiar with a VC or when information is transparent, they will not rely on the social benefits of participation and group referent but on other benefits, such as saving in time and effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information value, entertainment value, friendship value were measured by the purposive value (three items), entertainment value (four items), and interpersonal connectivity (three items) scales, respectively, suggested by Dholakia et al 15 A three-item scale was adapted from Verhoef et al 19 to measure eWOM intention. Propensity to gossip was measured by a six-item social value subscale of the attitude toward the gossip scale developed by Litman and Pezzo.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dholakia et al 15 found that social influence variables, group norms, and social identity are perceived as value perceptions to a much greater extent among individuals belonging to small group-based virtual communities, compared with those belonging to large network-based virtual communities. Specifically, their findings indicate that members of large network-based communities seek a reputation to establish trust and status and to foster social interactions, since they usually don't know each other initially, and their motives are self-referent.…”
Section: Outcome Of Online Gossipmentioning
confidence: 99%