2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social network analysis trust–consensus based approach to group decision-making problems with interval-valued fuzzy reciprocal preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
147
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
147
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in the presence of a proper fuzzy logic system, deductions can also be made out of facts expressed in words or determined via the SA approach presented here. In conjunction with social network analysis (SNA) [63,[66][67][68], it could be possible for a company, for marketing purposes for example, to identify the most influential nodes in a network that have very or most positive sentiment towards a particular product [47][48][49].…”
Section: Basic Concepts On Perceptions and Linguistic Variables For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the presence of a proper fuzzy logic system, deductions can also be made out of facts expressed in words or determined via the SA approach presented here. In conjunction with social network analysis (SNA) [63,[66][67][68], it could be possible for a company, for marketing purposes for example, to identify the most influential nodes in a network that have very or most positive sentiment towards a particular product [47][48][49].…”
Section: Basic Concepts On Perceptions and Linguistic Variables For Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, similarity interpreted as a measure of general or widespread agreement, based on the use of a metric or distance function, is usually regarded as a criteria to use in measuring consensus [15,18,40,50]. By combining both consistency and similarity functions, Herrera-Viedma et al [29] developed a feedback mechanism to provide advice to experts in order to increase the consensus level of the group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other priori factors influencing trust relationship, such as historical interaction and reputation of experts are not considered [38,39]. A potential avenue to explore in future to address this issue is to construct trust relationship by combining a posteriori and a priori trust information to enhance the reliability of trust relationship in the recommendation mechanism in GDM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%