2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social network approach to analyzing water governance: The case of the Mkindo catchment, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
1
24

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
87
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…SNM has been extensively used in natural resource management (Bodin and Crona 2009;Stein et al 2011) and is being progressively applied in climate change adaptation (Aberman et al 2011).…”
Section: Implementing Adaptation Measures: Actors Institutions and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNM has been extensively used in natural resource management (Bodin and Crona 2009;Stein et al 2011) and is being progressively applied in climate change adaptation (Aberman et al 2011).…”
Section: Implementing Adaptation Measures: Actors Institutions and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quantitative 'proving' of SNA as a way of modeling and measuring social interaction reinforces subsequent confidence in structural mapping of networks and biophysical scientists' confidence in this tool. Such interest reflects the application of SNA across multiple disciplines, including ecology, psychology, organizational management (see for example, Stein et al 2011), and creativity and innovation in industrial design (Simon and Tellier 2011). SNA appears to offer a platform for interaction with social science qualitative theorists that is useful for those seeking ways to describe the interaction between social and ecological systems and quantitative and qualitative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also concerned with political, social and economic organizations and institutions and their relationships, which are important for water development and management [11,12,15]. However, according to Stein et al [16], the legal and institutional frameworks discussed above tend to focus on the formal administrative structure, those being explicitly stated in specific policy documents and laws. They argue that these may have little to do with the everyday reality of natural resource managers and users, their behavior and social interaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework For Water Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that these may have little to do with the everyday reality of natural resource managers and users, their behavior and social interaction. Furthermore, Stein et al [16] introduce a social network approach to analyzing water governance, particularly the aspects of the social complexity underpinning water resources governance. Tortajada [12] mentions the holistic approach in the agenda of future water governance.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework For Water Governancementioning
confidence: 99%