Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3319502.3374840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Social Robot as Therapy Facilitator in Interventions to Deal with Dementia-related Behavioral Symptoms

Abstract: Several studies have been reported on the use of social robots for dementia care. These robots have been used for diverse tasks such as for companionship, as an exercise coach, and as daily life assistant. However, most of these studies have assessed impact on participants only at the time when the interaction takes place rather than their medium or long-term effects. In this work, we report on a nine-week study conducted in a nursing home in which a autonomous social robot, called Eva, acts as facilitator of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with toy animals, both robotic pets and real animals can provide 2-way dynamic communication, so it is feasible to use a robot/robot pet as a companion object and an auxiliary technological device for stimulating the sensory and cognitive functions of elderly individuals. However, most of the existing studies exploring the effectiveness of robot pet interventions in the elderly population (eg, psychological and behavioral effects and impact on quality of life) have been conducted on institutionalized elderly individuals with dementia for which long-term care was provided [30][31][32][33]; few of the studies have included elderly persons in the community as the study population. In particular, there has been a lack of study on the attitudes, degree of acceptance, and needs of middle-aged and older adults as they relate to robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with toy animals, both robotic pets and real animals can provide 2-way dynamic communication, so it is feasible to use a robot/robot pet as a companion object and an auxiliary technological device for stimulating the sensory and cognitive functions of elderly individuals. However, most of the existing studies exploring the effectiveness of robot pet interventions in the elderly population (eg, psychological and behavioral effects and impact on quality of life) have been conducted on institutionalized elderly individuals with dementia for which long-term care was provided [30][31][32][33]; few of the studies have included elderly persons in the community as the study population. In particular, there has been a lack of study on the attitudes, degree of acceptance, and needs of middle-aged and older adults as they relate to robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a common drawback of existing dialogue systems ( Fitzpatrick et al, 2017 ; Harms et al, 2018 ). Nevertheless, great efforts are being made in this promising research field to create natural ‘human-like’ conversations ( Harms et al, 2018 ; Griol et al, 2019 ) 6 , including the exploration of conversational robots and voice-based systems for supporting cognitive impaired individuals ( Cruz-Sandoval et al, 2020 ; Pou-Prom et al, 2020 ; Salichs et al, 2020 ). A possibility for future work is to use the camera of the tablet PC running the robot’s software to automatically recognize user emotions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplary mobile and small robots for mental health support, including companionship, health monitoring, cognitive stimulation, and clinical therapy. (a) GrowMu [46], (b) Pepper from SoftBank Robotics [22], (c) Hobbit [20], (d) RAMCIP [47], (e) CompanionAble [21], (f) Kompai [48], (g) Silbot [49], (h) Bandit [19], (i) Reeti [50], (j) PaPeRo [51], (k) iCat [52] (l) IrobIQ [53], (m) Screening robot [54], (n) Mini [55], (o) Ryan [56], (p) Milo [57], (q) NAO from SoftBank Robotics [23], (r) Eva [58], (s) Sota [59].…”
Section: Conversational Social Robots For Target Usersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the robotic platforms reviewed were able to monitor user's wellbeing and overall health (14%). Importantly, the role of assisting patients with cognitive impairment or dementia in clinical therapies was the less common (10%), targeted by five robots only (with published results of SAR interventions): NAO [23], Eva [58], Sota [59], Bandit [19], and Ryan [56]. There is a clear gap in clinical translation of SAR platforms particularly for dementia care.…”
Section: ) Roles Of Sar For Mental Health Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%